I agree that it isn’t very clear. I took a look at the Lua mailing list,
and although there isn’t a clear yes or no regarding making changes,
portability and avoiding undefined behavior was mentioned, so maybe
it’s better to leave it as is. I only found one thread in that mailing
list, so it doesn’
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:53:15AM -0600, Ricky Cintron wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Apologies if I???m mistaken, but it appears that the Lua packages are built
> with the default conversion specifiers for strftime, which are defined in
> loslib.c (if I searched correctly). Unfortunately these do not
Hello all,
Apologies if I’m mistaken, but it appears that the Lua packages are built with
the default conversion specifiers for strftime, which are defined in loslib.c
(if I searched correctly). Unfortunately these do not include %l, %k, %s, %v an
%+, which are supported by OpenBSD’s strftime.
