Nah, you ought to change it to eight years, to match the 8 in java 8,
and then replace the reference to Sytem.currentTimeMillis with an
abstract time factory so that any user can redefine year length as a
class and so that anyone who knows which web site to visit can follow
the clear instructions t
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 02:23, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/12/31 00:13, Marc Espie wrote:
>> well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and
>> there is an explicit check for that in the build process.
>>
>> Just think about it.
>
> Can't go perpetuating 10-year-ol
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 02:23:03AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/12/31 00:13, Marc Espie wrote:
> > well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and
> > there is an explicit check for that in the build process.
> >
> > Just think about it.
>
> Can't go perpetu
On 30 December 2014 at 18:13, Marc Espie wrote:
> well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and
> there is an explicit check for that in the build process.
>
> Just think about it.
>
> I know 1st year students who are smarter than that.
>
> This is one of the stupidest
On 2014/12/31 00:13, Marc Espie wrote:
> well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and
> there is an explicit check for that in the build process.
>
> Just think about it.
Can't go perpetuating 10-year-old currencies, that would be terrible!
This should be reasonable
>well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and
>there is an explicit check for that in the build process.
>
>Just think about it.
>
>I know 1st year students who are smarter than that.
>
>This is one of the stupidest bugs I've seen, on a part with 19100...
Conterpoint:
well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and
there is an explicit check for that in the build process.
Just think about it.
I know 1st year students who are smarter than that.
This is one of the stupidest bugs I've seen, on a part with 19100...
