On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:40:25 +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>Anyway I shall go the plan9/rc(1) way.
I don't think that was a serious suggestion.
No matter what shell you prefer yourself for interactive use it is a
good idea to use the default shell in scripts which are intended for
wide use.
On 23:59:29 Dec 16, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>> How to make powerful and useful bash scripts to OpenBSD?
>> Should I make them work with pdksh or can I add bash as dependency?
>
> Are you talking about ports that require bash to build? I'd say convert
> them to use ksh,
On 23:38:01 Dec 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's your call. I tend to prefer the syntax of ksh. Some people
> prefer sh.If you like the truly exotic you can install the very
> powerfull rc from plan9 ports.
Wow.
Great. You saved my day.
But also given me work since I have to learn something n
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
How to make powerful and useful bash scripts to OpenBSD?
Should I make them work with pdksh or can I add bash as dependency?
Are you talking about ports that require bash to build? I'd say convert
them to use ksh, I don't see the point of installing a shell just t
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
Dear fellow porters,
How to make powerful and useful bash scripts to OpenBSD?
Should I make them work with pdksh or can I add bash as dependency?
Thanks.
-Girish
It's your call. I tend to prefer the syntax of ksh. Some people
prefer sh.If y
Dear fellow porters,
How to make powerful and useful bash scripts to OpenBSD?
Should I make them work with pdksh or can I add bash as dependency?
Thanks.
-Girish
