Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-30 Thread Volker Schlecht
For what it's worth: I'm fine with the patch, and learned a lot - thank you! On 1/30/22 11:48, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:22:12AM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: Hi, On 1/29/22 18:12, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Index: Makefile =

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:22:12AM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > Hi, > > > On 1/29/22 18:12, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > Index: Makefile > > === > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/Makefile,v > > retrieving revision 1

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-30 Thread Volker Schlecht
Hi, On 1/29/22 18:12, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.120 diff -u -p -r1.120 Makefile --- Makefile29 Jan 2022 07:37:14 - 1.120 ++

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 04:44:51PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 02:38:12PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > > > > New diff without gsc. > > > We can decide over a solution for this later. Either make the packages > > > explicitely conflict or rename the binary. > > >

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 02:38:12PM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > > New diff without gsc. > > We can decide over a solution for this later. Either make the packages > > explicitely conflict or rename the binary. > > I'm watching your tweaks and taking notes, but what's the point in keeping > a

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Volker Schlecht
New diff without gsc. We can decide over a solution for this later. Either make the packages explicitely conflict or rename the binary. I'm watching your tweaks and taking notes, but what's the point in keeping around all three, and particularly why do we want to keep the statically linked

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:13:16AM +0100, Volker Schlecht wrote: > Hi, > > On 1/29/22 09:35, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > -CFLAGS = -DSYS_TYPES_HAS_STDINT_TYPES > > +CFLAGS += -DSYS_TYPES_HAS_STDINT_TYPES > > I actually dont't think we even need to set that flag explicitly anymore, > ghostsc

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Volker Schlecht
Hi, On 1/29/22 09:35, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: -CFLAGS = -DSYS_TYPES_HAS_STDINT_TYPES +CFLAGS += -DSYS_TYPES_HAS_STDINT_TYPES I actually dont't think we even need to set that flag explicitly anymore, ghostscript built and worked fine without. But I didn't know if the reason why it

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 09:56:09AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 09:35:15AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Some cleanup to the ghostscript port: > > > > - do not override CFLAGS > > - add DEBUG_PACKAGES > > - remove most of the weird post-install dance, i

Re: ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 09:35:15AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Hi. > > Some cleanup to the ghostscript port: > > - do not override CFLAGS > - add DEBUG_PACKAGES > - remove most of the weird post-install dance, install gsx and gsc and don't > enforce strip(1) > gsc will conflict with gambi

ghostscript tweaks

2022-01-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hi. Some cleanup to the ghostscript port: - do not override CFLAGS - add DEBUG_PACKAGES - remove most of the weird post-install dance, install gsx and gsc and don't enforce strip(1) ok? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/p