On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:13:46AM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2024 00:26:50 +0100,
> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> >
> > What they are doing is wrong. Maybe if you move it out of Junk
> > a few times their algorithm learns or what, i do not know.
> > I would start screaming, b
On Sun, 12 May 2024 00:26:50 +0100,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> What they are doing is wrong. Maybe if you move it out of Junk
> a few times their algorithm learns or what, i do not know.
> I would start screaming, but normally noone listens anyhow, sure.
>
Yes, they are.
But they delivery int
Hello Kirill.
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
<98c1f03bc1d6c...@mx1.catap.net>:
...
|> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
|> <2fdd33f2325e6...@mx2.catap.net>:
|>|>|I imply that using ed25519 usually leads to malformed signature, \
...
|>|> Then these are not standard compliant. The DKIM standard 637
Hello Steffen,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 21:27:09 +0100,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
> <2fdd33f2325e6...@mx2.catap.net>:
>
> |>|I imply that using ed25519 usually leads to malformed signature, and some
> |>|big hosting providers treat double signature as bad signature i
Hello Kirill.
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
<2fdd33f2325e6...@mx2.catap.net>:
|On Sat, 11 May 2024 00:21:18 +0100,
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
|> <5285e80cbc0d1...@mx2.catap.net>:
|
|BTW this is quite wired address which seems like Message-Id
That is what it is.
Greetings,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 00:21:18 +0100,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
> <5285e80cbc0d1...@mx2.catap.net>:
BTW this is quite wired address which seems like Message-Id
> |
> |I imply that using ed25519 usually leads to malformed signature, and some
Hello.
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
<5285e80cbc0d1...@mx2.catap.net>:
|On Fri, 10 May 2024 10:47:43 +0100,
|Stuart Henderson wrote:
|> On 2024/05/10 11:40, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
|>> Afaict dkimpproxy is not using opendkim but p5-Mail-DKIM. dkimproxy
|>> itself also
On Fri, 10 May 2024 10:47:43 +0100,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2024/05/10 11:40, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> >
> > Afaict dkimpproxy is not using opendkim but p5-Mail-DKIM. dkimproxy
> > itself also hasn't seen a update since many years, but the underlying
>
let add reference to this issue and suggest to use only
> > RSA/SHA256.
> >
> > Footnotes:
> > [1] https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenDKIM/issues/6
> >
> Hi,
>
> Afaict dkimpproxy is not using opendkim but p5-Mail-DKIM. dkimproxy
> itself also
5 and this project seems to be
> not that alive, so, no hope that it will be released and distributed soon.
>
> My point: let add reference to this issue and suggest to use only RSA/SHA256.
>
> Footnotes:
> [1] https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenDKIM/issues/6
>
Hi,
On Fri, 10 May 2024 06:57:20 +0100,
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6376#section-3.3 says that
> rsa-sha256 SHOULD be used. Unfortunatly Mail::DKIM::Signer uses
> rsa-sha1 by default when no algorithm is specifed.
>
> Update the dkimproxy.out sample config...
>
> Mak
=====
> RCS file: /local/cvs/ports/mail/dkimproxy/Makefile,v
> diff -u -p -u -r1.8 Makefile
> --- Makefile 7 Nov 2023 14:19:36 - 1.8
> +++ Makefile 10 May 2024 05:51:47 -
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> COMMENT =SMTP proxy to verify or add
checkers) happier, and hopefully less
rejects by hotmail/google and co...
comments? ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /local/cvs/ports/mail/dkimproxy/Makefile,v
diff -u -p -u -r1.8 Makefile
--- Makefile7 Nov 2023 14:19:36 -
Solved by removing perl5 from upgraded 6.9 and place initial perl5 folders from
fresh 6.9 install. All the p5-* dependencies have been reinstalled.
Since then dkimproxy_out starts successfully.
Thanks
Martin
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 6, 2021 7:27 PM, Andrew Hewus Fresh
Great.
Should I remove?
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/amd64-openbsd/auto/Encode/Encode.so
Martin
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:58 PM, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 01:44:19PM +, Martin wrote:
>
> > After upgrade dkimpro
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 06:29:08PM +, Martin wrote:
> Great.
>
> Should I remove?
> /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/amd64-openbsd/auto/Encode/Encode.so
This is a customization of your system outside something supported by
OpenBSD, you should follow the advice of your local system administr
After upgrade dkimproxy and error appeared, I did 'pkg_delete dkimproxy' and
'pkg_delete -a' afterwards to clean up dependent Perl modules (possible broken
ones).
'pkg_add dkimproxy' to install it from scratch with all working p5 modules. It
didn't help, the
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 01:44:19PM +, Martin wrote:
> After upgrade dkimproxy and error appeared, I did 'pkg_delete dkimproxy' and
> 'pkg_delete -a' afterwards to clean up dependent Perl modules (possible
> broken ones).
>
> 'pkg_add dkimproxy' t
On 5/6/21 3:22 PM, Martin wrote:
Hi list,
After upgrading packages on 6.9amd64 dkimproxy_out won't start with error:
rcctl -d start dkimproxy_out
doing rc_check
Encode.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got handshake key
0xb60, needed 0xec0)
doing _rc_rm_runfile
M
Hi list,
After upgrading packages on 6.9amd64 dkimproxy_out won't start with error:
rcctl -d start dkimproxy_out
doing rc_check
Encode.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got handshake key
0xb60, needed 0xec0)
doing _rc_rm_runfile
Martin
CCing a few lists in the hope that more people will see it.
On 2017/02/05 20:47, Heiko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> dkimproy and amavis broken with new per version:
>
> # /usr/local/bin/dkimproxy.out --daemonize
> perl:/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/amd64-openbsd/auto/Crypt/OpenSSL/Bignum/Bignum.so:
Giovanni Bechis bigio.snb.it> writes:
> Fixed users id, other than that, ok giovanni
> Cheers
> Giovanni
Is anyone about to finally import it? ;)
"Alexey E. Suslikov" writes:
> Giovanni Bechis bigio.snb.it> writes:
>
> > On 07/14/13 18:48, Roman Kravchuk wrote:
> > > Updated port from sthen
> > >
> > > * Include rc scripts with fix from william
> > > * My fix: installed perl library to libdata/perl5/site_perl
> > >
> > > Ok? Comments
Giovanni Bechis bigio.snb.it> writes:
> On 07/14/13 18:48, Roman Kravchuk wrote:
> > Updated port from sthen
> >
> > * Include rc scripts with fix from william
> > * My fix: installed perl library to libdata/perl5/site_perl
> >
> > Ok? Comments?
> >
> Fixed users id, other than that, ok gi
l 2013 09:59:46 -
@@ -229,3 +229,4 @@ id user group port options
718 _stuntman _stuntman telephony/stuntman
719 _puppetdb _puppetdb databases/puppetdb
720 _lldpd _lldpd net/lldpd
+721 _dkimproxy _dkimproxy mail/dkimproxy
Updated port from sthen@
* Include rc scripts with fix from william@
* My fix: installed perl library to libdata/perl5/site_perl
Ok? Comments?
2013/7/12 Giovanni Bechis
> On 07/12/13 02:51, William Yodlowsky wrote:
> > On 11 July 2013 at 11:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >> On 07/10/13 22:23,
On 07/12/13 02:51, William Yodlowsky wrote:
> On 11 July 2013 at 11:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> On 07/10/13 22:23, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2013/07/10 19:00, Roman Kravchuk wrote:
My patches is necessary to install libraries in
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl.
>>>
>>> OK - tha
x27;t use
> them for rc scripts) and --daemonize is in $daemon - however it also needs
> rc_reload=NO which you have and I missed before.
>
> I've really not got time to look further at the moment though...I mostly
> wanted to send the port out to avoid duplicated work..
>
ok further at the moment though...I mostly
> wanted to send the port out to avoid duplicated work..
>
>
> diff -uNr dkimproxy/pkg/PLIST dkimproxy-rc/pkg/PLIST
> --- dkimproxy/pkg/PLIST Tue Jul 9 07:23:24 2013
> +++ dkimproxy-rc/pkg/PLISTTue Jul 9 07:45:02 2013
>
hich you have and I missed before.
I've really not got time to look further at the moment though...I mostly
wanted to send the port out to avoid duplicated work..
diff -uNr dkimproxy/pkg/PLIST dkimproxy-rc/pkg/PLIST
--- dkimproxy/pkg/PLIST Tue Jul 9 07:23:24 2013
+++ dkimproxy-rc/pkg/PLIST
10 16:04, Roman Kravchuk wrote:
> > I've created several months ago this port for my mail server.
> >
> > Comments are welcomed
>
> Several of the patches seem unneccessary ..
>
> > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> > -#!/usr/bin/perl -I../lib
> > #
> > #
On 2013/07/10 16:04, Roman Kravchuk wrote:
> I've created several months ago this port for my mail server.
>
> Comments are welcomed
Several of the patches seem unneccessary ..
> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> -#!/usr/bin/perl -I../lib
> #
> # This file is part of DKIMproxy,
pOrg> I wish someone would package dkimproxy for #OpenBSD ...
> > >
> > > I've had this sitting in mystuff/ for 2 years, just dusted it off and
> > > updated it... it needs an rc.d script writing, no time to do it myself
> > > at the moment, any takers?
>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:28:23PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:29:47PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > <@PoolpOrg> I wish someone would package dkimproxy for #OpenBSD ...
> >
> > I've had this sitting in mystuff/ for 2 years, just
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:29:47PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> <@PoolpOrg> I wish someone would package dkimproxy for #OpenBSD ...
>
> I've had this sitting in mystuff/ for 2 years, just dusted it off and
> updated it... it needs an rc.d script writing, no time t
<@PoolpOrg> I wish someone would package dkimproxy for #OpenBSD ...
I've had this sitting in mystuff/ for 2 years, just dusted it off and
updated it... it needs an rc.d script writing, no time to do it myself
at the moment, any takers?
dkimproxy.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
36 matches
Mail list logo
