On 2025/04/17 15:50, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 05:07:51 +
> develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
>
> > Slightly off topic, but any plans for SDL 3?
>
> I have a draft, but don't see a point in making a port before something
> would actually use it.
FWIW, fluidsynth supports it
I came across a CMake project that couldn't find sdl2-net. I've seen
the problem before: it's because the cmake config is looking for an
unversioned .so. We already have equivalent patches in sdl2, sdl2-image,
sdl2-mixer, sdl2-ttf.
ok?
diff 5a3b2804456bd22fe0e22a52774b96faf45326b9
5a70c43569e751
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 05:07:51 +
develo...@robert-palm.de wrote:
> Slightly off topic, but any plans for SDL 3?
I have a draft, but don't see a point in making a port before something
would actually use it.
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 06:49:42 +0200
Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed Apr 16, 2025 at 09:23:50PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > I came across a CMake project that couldn't find sdl2-net. I've seen
> > the problem before: it's because the cmake config is looking for an
> > unversioned .so. We a
Slightly off topic, but any plans for SDL 3?
https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/releases/tag/release-3.2.0
On Wed Apr 16, 2025 at 09:23:50PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
+ endif()
On Wed Apr 16, 2025 at 09:23:50PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> I came across a CMake project that couldn't find sdl2-net. I've seen
> the problem before: it's because the cmake config is looking for an
> unversioned .so. We already have equivalent patches in sdl2, sdl2-image,
> sdl2-mixer, sd
