> OK, I'll have some patience :-). Do note that one issue in boost::threads
> that clang16 trips on is solved by 1.83.
Boost 1.83 is committed now. Thanks to Brad for doing the heavy lifting.
> Also attached is another patch to fix the issue shown by mapnik. That's been
> around for a
> few Boost releases but upstream still has not commited a proper fix.
Ah good. That should fix freeorion as well. prusaslicer is unrelated,
and postgis (also unrelated) was fixed.
Let's see what the cl
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 01:39:01PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:11:14PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:01:15PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2023/11/15 08:26, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > Any reason to not commit this?
> > >
> > > I did
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:11:14PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:01:15PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/11/15 08:26, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > Any reason to not commit this?
> >
> > I didn't manage to get a bulk done before the llvm 16 carnage - here's
> > an
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:01:15PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/11/15 08:26, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Any reason to not commit this?
>
> I didn't manage to get a bulk done before the llvm 16 carnage - here's
> an updated diff against -current, but it will be hard to get good
> testing
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 04:34:01PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 11/15/2023 2:26 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:55:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:50:33PM -
On 11/15/2023 2:26 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:55:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:50:33PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 0
On 2023/11/15 08:26, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Any reason to not commit this?
I didn't manage to get a bulk done before the llvm 16 carnage - here's
an updated diff against -current, but it will be hard to get good
testing at the moment.
Index: Makefile
==
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:55:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:50:33PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:03:2
On Tue Nov 07, 2023 at 11:55:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:50:33PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:03:20P
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:50:33PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
>
> > On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 08:13:45AM
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:50:33PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 08:13:45AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:52:39AM +, St
On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 08:13:45AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:52:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Doesn't hurt but we probably don't need #ifdef around SYS_ge
On amd64, this makes no sense because we don't use stack protector.
It is retguard. So something smells, it is like their handwritten
context switcher wasn't handling the full context before. But that
might only matter if it unrolls via two seperate methods, or if a
new function above has become
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 08:13:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:52:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Doesn't hurt but we probably don't need #ifdef around SYS_getrandom tbh.
> >
> > Has anyone looked at updating boost recently? It would be a good time in our
> > rel
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:52:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Doesn't hurt but we probably don't need #ifdef around SYS_getrandom tbh.
>
> Has anyone looked at updating boost recently? It would be a good time in our
> release cycle and I can do an i386 bulk if anyone has a diff handy.
>
> -
Doesn't hurt but we probably don't need #ifdef around SYS_getrandom tbh.
Has anyone looked at updating boost recently? It would be a good time in
our release cycle and I can do an i386 bulk if anyone has a diff handy.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 28 October 2023 11
OK.
On 2023-10-28 6:16 a.m., Rafael Sadowski wrote:
Here is a diff to remove syscall(2) in boost. I have deliberately worked
with defined(__OpenBSD__) so that this can also push to upstream.
OK?
diff --git a/devel/boost/Makefile b/devel/boost/Makefile
index 91f25cb5c9e..2eec1a35b88 100644
---
Here is a diff to remove syscall(2) in boost. I have deliberately worked
with defined(__OpenBSD__) so that this can also push to upstream.
OK?
diff --git a/devel/boost/Makefile b/devel/boost/Makefile
index 91f25cb5c9e..2eec1a35b88 100644
--- a/devel/boost/Makefile
+++ b/devel/boost/Makefile
@@ -1
19 matches
Mail list logo
