Re: databases/postgresql, changes to the -server subpackage

2006-10-20 Thread Emerson Farrugia
Looks good. A couple of trivial suggestions... 1. The phrase "dba account" in the following lines is ambiguous, since a DBA account can either be "_postgresql" on the system or "postgres" on the database, or at least those are the defaults. It will leave less people scratching their heads if you

Re: databases/postgresql, changes to the -server subpackage

2006-10-18 Thread patrick ~
I'm a bit confused with your patch and comments. The bit that reads: -- +a default database first. In the following example we install a database +in /var/postgresql/data with a dba account 'postgres' and md5 authentication. +We will be prompted for a password to protect the dba account: -- Do

Re: databases/postgresql, changes to the -server subpackage

2006-10-18 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Marc Balmer [Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:26:32PM +0200] wrote: >I am changing slightly the way we install a PostgreSQL server. To >recall, up to now installing the postgresql-server package created a >default database for you. But this database was not secured. > >This has led to problems in some ins

Re: databases/postgresql, changes to the -server subpackage

2006-10-18 Thread Peter Valchev
> I am changing slightly the way we install a PostgreSQL server. To > recall, up to now installing the postgresql-server package created a > default database for you. But this database was not secured. > > This has led to problems in some installations where the users were not > aware of this.

databases/postgresql, changes to the -server subpackage

2006-10-18 Thread Marc Balmer
I am changing slightly the way we install a PostgreSQL server. To recall, up to now installing the postgresql-server package created a default database for you. But this database was not secured. This has led to problems in some installations where the users were not aware of this. So no databa