On 2020-05-17, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Should we have infrastructure support for this, like FreeBSD's
> EXTRACT_ONLY?
For the record: I misremembered. FreeBSD's EXTRACT_ONLY is something
else entirely.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On 2020/05/18 00:28, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 09:55:51PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Didn't this come up with another port relatively recently?
> > Should we have infrastructure support for this, like FreeBSD's
> > EXTRACT_ONLY?
> Not that I know of, unless you mean
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 09:55:51PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Didn't this come up with another port relatively recently?
> Should we have infrastructure support for this, like FreeBSD's
> EXTRACT_ONLY?
Not that I know of, unless you mean sysutils/mdprint were I tweaked
post-extract a bit,
On 2020-05-15, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> The distfile is only about 40M big but extracts to 205M sources, of
> which we only ever need two directories that sum up to 7M; it also
> makes it clearer what this port actually requires from upstream and
> WRKSRC is lot cleaner.
Didn't this come up with
The distfile is only about 40M big but extracts to 205M sources, of
which we only ever need two directories that sum up to 7M; it also
makes it clearer what this port actually requires from upstream and
WRKSRC is lot cleaner.
Feedback? OK?
Index: Makefile
===
