On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:55:48PM -0600, Lucas Raab wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> Following up on the call for testers on barman, I am wondering if there
> are users of:
>
> ...
> * databases/py-pg_activity
Your diff works for me. Some remarks:
- Although the GH_ACCOUNT switched the distinfo checksum
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:55:48PM -0600, Lucas Raab wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Following up on the call for testers on barman, I am wondering if there
> > are users of:
> >
> > * databases/pgloader
> > * databases/skytools
> > * dat
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 08:51:08AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/12/15 20:55, Lucas Raab wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Following up on the call for testers on barman, I am wondering if there
> > are users of:
> >
> > * databases/pgloader
> > * databases/skytools
> > * databases/py-pg_activ
On 2020/12/15 20:55, Lucas Raab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following up on the call for testers on barman, I am wondering if there
> are users of:
>
> * databases/pgloader
> * databases/skytools
> * databases/py-pg_activity
> * geo/osm2pgsql
>
> pgloader and skytools in ports are very old. skytools is
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:55:48PM -0600, Lucas Raab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following up on the call for testers on barman, I am wondering if there
> are users of:
>
> * databases/pgloader
> * databases/skytools
> * databases/py-pg_activity
> * geo/osm2pgsql
if you look at your diff, psycopg2 is us
t all. I am wondering if
they can be removed.
If there are users of the latter two, can you try out the attached
diffs and report any breakage/success? The aim to get all consumers of
py-psycopg2 onto python3.
cc: maintainers of pgloader/skytools and py-pg_activity
Thanks,
Lucas
