Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-21 Thread Alexander von Gernler
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-20 17:35]: > Update for 4.2-stable at: > http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.2-stable/clamav-0.92.diff I have a diff that updates clamav to 0.92 on -current. It passes the lib-depends-check target, and also the targets displayed by show-requ

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Marc Balmer
Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:28:19PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: Helmut Schneider wrote: Hi, I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it with postfix and it is running fine for more than 24h now. Attached are distinfo and Mak

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:28:19PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: > Helmut Schneider wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it >> with postfix and it is running fine for more than 24h now. Attached are >> d

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Ian McWilliam
Stuart Henderson wrote: After it's updated in -current the backport to -stable should be reasonably straightforward. Just be honest. In the -current world this is unlikely to happen. Ian McWilliam.

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Marc Balmer
Helmut Schneider wrote: Hi, I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it with postfix and it is running fine for more than 24h now. Attached are distinfo and Makefile (partially stolen from FreeBSD). The 'patches' directory can be removed. There

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread viq
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 03:15:22PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Currently clamav is at 0.90.3 for 4.2 stable so I am a bit concerned about > 0.92 will find its way to the stable ports tree. With how things currently are, it won't. 4.2 ports currently are not updated. -- viq

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Helmut Schneider
From: "Stuart Henderson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 2007/12/20 14:00, Helmut Schneider wrote: From: "Stuart Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 2007/12/20 13:11, Helmut Schneider wrote: I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it with

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/12/20 14:00, Helmut Schneider wrote: > From: "Stuart Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> On 2007/12/20 13:11, Helmut Schneider wrote: >>> I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm >>> using it with postfix and it

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Helmut Schneider
From: "Stuart Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 2007/12/20 13:11, Helmut Schneider wrote: I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it with postfix and it is running fine for more than 24h now. Attached are distinfo and Makefile (partiall

Re: clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/12/20 13:11, Helmut Schneider wrote: > I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it > with postfix and it is running fine for more than 24h now. Attached are > distinfo and Makefile (partially stolen from FreeBSD). > The 'patches

clamav-0.92

2007-12-20 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I successfully compiled clamav-0.92 from ports on 4.2 stable. I'm using it with postfix and it is running fine for more than 24h now. Attached are distinfo and Makefile (partially stolen from FreeBSD). The 'patches' directory can be removed. There is no warranty. I nev