Re: systrace on ports, was: Re: broken: nut

2005-06-25 Thread Michael Coulter
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:24:01PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > i.e. WRKDIR gets set by the directory you're in, not ${PORTSDIR} > > yes, but WRKDIR should not be PORTSDIR in any case - it's two levels > down for most ports, and three on some. > > Eg, WRKDIR=${PORTSDIR} + "/" + "sysutils/nut"

systrace on ports, was: Re: broken: nut

2005-06-24 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 23.06.2005 at 12:23:42 -0700, Michael Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # PORTSDIR=/symlink_to_usr_ports cd /usr/ports/sysutils/nut && make > show=WRKDIR > /usr/ports/sysutils/nut/w-nut-2.0.0 > > i.e. WRKDIR gets set by the directory you're in, not ${PORTSDIR

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-23 Thread Michael Coulter
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:02:13PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > I'm not sure about what you mean here, # PORTSDIR=/symlink_to_usr_ports cd /symlink_to_usr_ports/sysutils/nut && make show=WRKDIR /symlink_to_usr_ports/sysutils/nut/w-nut-2.0.0 # PORTSDIR=/symlink_to_usr_ports cd /usr/ports/sysutils

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Nicolay, On Wed, 22.06.2005 at 08:03:25 +0200, Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Toni Mueller [2005-06-21]: > > native-fswrite: filename match "/usr/S/ports/distfiles" then permit > > native-fswrite: filename match "/usr/ports/sysutils/nut/w-nut-2.0.0" > > then permit > > T

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 21.06.2005 at 14:06:12 -0700, Michael Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lines like this one are the culprit. It looks like you ran make extract > from /usr/ports as opposed to /usr/S/ports. In the case where WRKOBJDIR > is not set, WRKDIR uses ${.CURDIR} as it's base path. I'm not

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 21.06.2005 at 14:06:12 -0700, Michael Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Btw, while I'm at it, this machine, despite being amd64, creates > > ...ports/packages/i386/... instead of ...porets/packages/amd64/... > > This is because you told it to :) ok, stupid me :-| Best, --Toni

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-22 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* Toni Mueller [2005-06-21]: > native-fswrite: filename match "/usr/S/ports/distfiles" then permit > native-fswrite: filename match "/usr/ports/sysutils/nut/w-nut-2.0.0" > then permit This indeed is a very strange entry. Is /usr/ports a hardlink to /usr/S/ports? Otherwise I don't see

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-21 Thread Michael Coulter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:13:04PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > native-fswrite: filename match "/usr/ports/sysutils/nut/w-nut-2.0.0" > then permit Lines like this one are the culprit. It looks like you ran make extract from /usr/ports as opposed to /usr/S/ports. In the case where WRKOBJDI

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-21 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 18.06.2005 at 22:34:11 +0200, Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Toni Mueller [2005-06-18]: > > - Building the port breaks when using systrace at archive extraction > > phase: > Show me the port's systrace.policy file, please. I cannot reproduce your > problem. no problem

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-18 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* Toni Mueller [2005-06-18]: > - Building the port breaks when using systrace at archive extraction > phase: Show me the port's systrace.policy file, please. I cannot reproduce your problem. Nikolay

Re: broken: nut

2005-06-18 Thread Alexandre Anriot
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 05:36:30PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > Hello, > > since there is no maintainer listed in the nut Makefile, I'd like to > ask the list: > > - I assume that nut currently has no maintainer? MAINTAINER= Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in -current ;-) -- Alexandre Anri

broken: nut

2005-06-18 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, since there is no maintainer listed in the nut Makefile, I'd like to ask the list: - I assume that nut currently has no maintainer? - Building the port breaks when using systrace at archive extraction phase: ===> Extracting for nut-2.0.0 systrace: deny user: root, prog: /bin/tar,