On Tue Aug 21, 2018 at 10:30:47AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> On Thu, August 2, 2018 12:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/08/02 07:08, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> >> Hi Kirill,
> >>
> >> I really really like it! My terms for an okay are simple:
> >>
> >> - Step #1: All consumers build fine.
>
On Thu, August 2, 2018 12:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/08/02 07:08, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>> Hi Kirill,
>>
>> I really really like it! My terms for an okay are simple:
>>
>> - Step #1: All consumers build fine.
>> - AMD64 and !AMD64 bulk
>
> More like clang and !clang, an i386 bulk isn't
On 2018/08/02 07:08, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> I really really like it! My terms for an okay are simple:
>
> - Step #1: All consumers build fine.
> - AMD64 and !AMD64 bulk
More like clang and !clang, an i386 bulk isn't going to tell you much.
But you'll be waiting a long time if yo
Hi Kirill,
I really really like it! My terms for an okay are simple:
- Step #1: All consumers build fine.
- AMD64 and !AMD64 bulk
ok rsadowski@ with the conditions above.
On Mon Jul 30, 2018 at 11:36:20AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm aware of previous discussions about ICU support i
On Mon, July 30, 2018 11:36, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm aware of previous discussions about ICU support in boost [1] and [2]/
> This time it's a complete switch not flavored one.
> Runtime was tested with libreoffice and new wesnoth on amd64, wesnoth
> on macppc. Building of some random port
Hi!
I'm aware of previous discussions about ICU support in boost [1] and [2]/
This time it's a complete switch not flavored one.
Runtime was tested with libreoffice and new wesnoth on amd64, wesnoth
on macppc. Building of some random ports using boost_locale also
went fine on macppc and amd64.
With
