On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 06:36:34PM +, Joe B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed openbsd and I'm happy.. coming from FreeBSD and lots of
> stuff are different.
>
> I like ports to have options between binary and source.
>
> In freebsd you could make showconfig to see whats configured by def
Original Message
On 10/10/24 8:56 PM, Timo Myyrä wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10 2024, Joe B wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just installed openbsd and I'm happy.. coming from FreeBSD and lots of
> stuff are different.
> >
> > I like ports to have options between binary and s
On Thu, Oct 10 2024, Joe B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed openbsd and I'm happy.. coming from FreeBSD and lots of
> stuff are different.
>
> I like ports to have options between binary and source.
>
> In freebsd you could make showconfig to see whats configured by default. you
> could do m
Hello,
I just installed openbsd and I'm happy.. coming from FreeBSD and lots of stuff
are different.
I like ports to have options between binary and source.
In freebsd you could make showconfig to see whats configured by default. you
could do make config to change the default options then make
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 01:18:27PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> This converts 70 ports that use pytest over to using MODPY_PYTEST.
Thanks!
> Some ports want to write to HOME, so to make them happy I added "HOME=/tmp"
> to their TEST_ENV. There may be a more preferred destination for this sort
Isn’t PORTHOME (can’t remember the exact variable name) prefered over HOME ?
—
Antoine
> On 24 Mar 2019, at 18:18, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>
> This converts 70 ports that use pytest over to using MODPY_PYTEST.
>
> The only straggler is geo/gdal, which I have left out. gdal is a very
> complica
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2013/02/15 15:38, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your report, however I find this rather weird...
>> Excerpt from emacs23_make.log:
>
> gperf built ok on vax in the last -current package snapshot.
>
> emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
>
>
On 2013/02/15 18:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> looks like simh on my laptop is about half the speed of a vax 4000/90 at
> building things. not great but it's not vastly more painful. no idea how
> network i/o compares but it has been mentioned that that's rather slow..
See the updated instructions
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2013/02/15 13:39, Hany Aziz wrote:
>> Are you referring to the precompiled binaries or to the ports that
>> will compile and is there another version of OpenBSD that will allow
>> more packages to install or compile on the Vax? In other words can I
>> install another
On 2013/02/15 13:39, Hany Aziz wrote:
> Are you referring to the precompiled binaries or to the ports that
> will compile and is there another version of OpenBSD that will allow
> more packages to install or compile on the Vax? In other words can I
> install another version of openbsd and have less
Remember that the GCC compiler on the VAX install is a modified gcc v 2.9.5.
Not sure if the error messages were even more cryptic then. Also not sure if
the fact that the machine I am using has only 32 megs of RAM is a factor. Once
I master SIMH I may try to run it under emulation on my x86 mac
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 06:44:17PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/02/15 18:28, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
> >
> > Cool...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > it's pretty sad that only ~320 packa
On 2013/02/15 18:28, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
>
> Cool...
>
> [...]
>
> > it's pretty sad that only ~320 packages built (and several of these
> > are just "recompress a bunch of files for things which
Are you referring to the precompiled binaries or to the ports that will compile
and is there another version of OpenBSD that will allow more packages to
install or compile on the Vax? In other words can I install another version of
openbsd and have less issues? All I really want is gcc, gdb, ema
Stuart Henderson writes:
[...]
> emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
Cool...
[...]
> it's pretty sad that only ~320 packages built (and several of these
> are just "recompress a bunch of files for things which aren't useful on
> vax anyway"). weird too though, there are various things
BTW the email earlier today will appear to be coming from "Charlie Root"
r...@bsd.bsd.vax
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Hany.
On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hany Aziz wrote:
> Remember that the GCC compiler on the VAX install is a modified gcc v 2.9.5.
> Not sure if the error messages were even more cr
On 2013/02/15 15:38, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Thanks for your report, however I find this rather weird...
> Excerpt from emacs23_make.log:
gperf built ok on vax in the last -current package snapshot.
emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
cc -nostartfiles-L/usr/local/lib
Thanks for your report, however I find this rather weird...
Excerpt from emacs23_make.log:
[...]
===> Building for gperf-3.0.4
cd lib; make all
cc -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./getopt.c
cc -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./getopt1.c
c++ -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./getline.cc
c++ -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./hash.cc
rm -f libgp.a
ar rc libg
(Trimming the Cc list, keeping only ports@)
Hany Aziz writes:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> I have just tried again to install emacs 21 from the 5.2 release ports with
> no_X11 and again it gives me an error message. Is it possible to try to
> install just emacs 21 (and possibly git) from "cur
Thanks for the response.
I have just tried again to install emacs 21 from the 5.2 release ports with
no_X11 and again it gives me an error message. Is it possible to try to
install just emacs 21 (and possibly git) from "current" without having to
upgrade my entire install to the latest snapsh
BTW I also tried to install emacs v 18.x using the source code from the FSF GNU
website hoping that it's age and the fact that it was probably contemporary to
the VAX as a new machine and probably older than GCC 2.9.5 but that compilation
also failed.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 4:42 AM, Stuart Henders
[ Note: reply-to is set to ports@ ]
On 2013/02/10 20:37, Hany Aziz wrote:
> I have attempted to install from ports multiple programs both small and
> large
> (Emacs 21, Emacs 23, Zile, Git, Gtypist and others) they invariably fail
> during the compilation stage.
One failure of the emacs po
22 matches
Mail list logo
