On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 08:03:06AM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > On 2021/02/23 17:17, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> >>
> >> Stuart Henderson writes:
> >>
> >> > On 2021/02/23 15:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> >> I'll do some testing, I'm using
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021/02/23 17:17, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>>
>> Stuart Henderson writes:
>>
>> > On 2021/02/23 15:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >> I'll do some testing, I'm using this updated diff
>> >
>> > Oh yuk, gnu m4 is now needed at runtime for libtoolize.
>> > Is
On 2021/02/23 17:17, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > On 2021/02/23 15:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> I'll do some testing, I'm using this updated diff
> >
> > Oh yuk, gnu m4 is now needed at runtime for libtoolize.
> > Is there a way around that?
>
> This i
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021/02/23 15:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> I'll do some testing, I'm using this updated diff
>
> Oh yuk, gnu m4 is now needed at runtime for libtoolize.
> Is there a way around that?
This is probably from
- GNU M4 is required to run libtoolize in a directory
On 2021/02/23 21:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/02/23 15:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I'll do some testing, I'm using this updated diff
>
> Oh yuk, gnu m4 is now needed at runtime for libtoolize.
> Is there a way around that?
Also requires help2man as a BUILD_DEPENDS (but that's not so
On 2021/02/23 15:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'll do some testing, I'm using this updated diff
Oh yuk, gnu m4 is now needed at runtime for libtoolize.
Is there a way around that?
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021/02/23 07:44, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I see that you added
>>
>> touch -r .version Makefile.in aclocal.m4 m4/ltversion.m4 configure
>>
>> Which I assume is to prevent make from trying to recreate those files. I
>> also see that you
On 2021/02/23 07:44, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I see that you added
>
> touch -r .version Makefile.in aclocal.m4 m4/ltversion.m4 configure
>
> Which I assume is to prevent make from trying to recreate those files. I
> also see that you upgraded autoconf:
Yes, it happens be
Thanks!
I see that you added
touch -r .version Makefile.in aclocal.m4 m4/ltversion.m4 configure
Which I assume is to prevent make from trying to recreate those files. I
also see that you upgraded autoconf:
AUTOCONF_VERSION= 2.69
But given the "touch", is autoconf still needed?
Thanks,
Rafael
I'll do some testing, I'm using this updated diff
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libtool/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -p -r1.85 Makefile
--- Makefile12 Jul 2019 20:44:40 - 1.85
+++ Makefile
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola writes:
>>> lang/rust:
>>> LLVM ERROR: invalid sh_type for string table section [index 34]: expected
>>> SHT_STRTAB, but got SHT_NULL
>>
>> Could you try with the following diff on lang/rust ? It removes the
>> dependency on libtool. It build fine on -current tree.
>
>
Sebastien Marie writes:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:55:45PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson writes:
>> >
>> > And there are ports with USE_LIBTOOL=gnu:
>>
>> Cool. I have been able to build most of them, and the errors I got don't
>> look libtool related:
>>
>> lan
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:55:45PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
> >
> > And there are ports with USE_LIBTOOL=gnu:
>
> Cool. I have been able to build most of them, and the errors I got don't
> look libtool related:
>
> lang/mono:
> Fatal: /usr/ports/pobj mus
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021/02/16 10:09, Marc Espie wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>> > The last release of libtool is 2.4.6, which is from 2015. We currently
>> > have 2.4.2. I don't expect projects to actually require 2.4.6, but given
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:20:20AM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Marc Espie writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> >> The last release of libtool is 2.4.6, which is from 2015. We currently
> >> have 2.4.2. I don't expect projects to
Marc Espie writes:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>> The last release of libtool is 2.4.6, which is from 2015. We currently
>> have 2.4.2. I don't expect projects to actually require 2.4.6, but given
>> how old 2.4.6 is, some check for that version.
>
On 2021/02/16 10:09, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> > The last release of libtool is 2.4.6, which is from 2015. We currently
> > have 2.4.2. I don't expect projects to actually require 2.4.6, but given
> > how old 2.4.6 is, some chec
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> The last release of libtool is 2.4.6, which is from 2015. We currently
> have 2.4.2. I don't expect projects to actually require 2.4.6, but given
> how old 2.4.6 is, some check for that version.
>
> Given that libtool is
This is the first time I try to change anything in ports. What would be
the best way to test this?
Cheers,
Rafael
commit aa84897eb8840f32739b1d61fa5ae230ec8f232e
Author: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
Date: Tue Sep 22 22:27:59 2020 -0700
Update libtool
Building sane-backends fro
Here is a minor update to libtool 1.5.24.
http://tinyurl.com/yqjksc
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libtool/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -p -r1.65 Makefile
--- Makefile4 Jun 2007 19:00:16 -
20 matches
Mail list logo
