Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.04.24 um 13:45 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: Are they? $ llvm-readelf -sW /usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.0 | grep -F .objc_ | grep HIDDEN $ They all seem to have DEFAULT visibility, but maybe I'm missing something. Interesting, there seems to be a compiler bug, where sometimes it fo

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Le Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer a écrit : > Am 15.04.24 um 13:24 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: > > > Am 15.04.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: > > > > > Heh, I remember I asked pretty much the same question when handling a > > > previous update.  Could you

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Le Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:24:40PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer a écrit : > Am 15.04.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: > > > Heh, I remember I asked pretty much the same question when handling a > > previous update. Could you please write down a comment above > > SHARED_LIBS that explain

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.04.24 um 13:24 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: Am 15.04.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: Heh, I remember I asked pretty much the same question when handling a previous update.  Could you please write down a comment above SHARED_LIBS that explains roughly which changes don't requ

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.04.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: Heh, I remember I asked pretty much the same question when handling a previous update. Could you please write down a comment above SHARED_LIBS that explains roughly which changes don't require a bump? That way you'll save precious developer

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:44:35PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Am 14.04.24 um 22:32 schrieb Theo Buehler: > > > or are these .objc_* symbols somehow special? > > Those are all .objc_sel_name*. Those are symbols that just contain the > selector name as a string. That's a selector being *use

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 14.04.24 um 22:32 schrieb Theo Buehler: or are these .objc_* symbols somehow special? Those are all .objc_sel_name*. Those are symbols that just contain the selector name as a string. That's a selector being *used*, not exported. They're pretty similar to local symbols, however, they're n

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-14 Thread Theo Buehler
Thanks. > +SHARED_LIBS += objfw 0.1 I think libobjfw needs a major bump due to symbol removal: removed: .objc_sel_namefileIRIWithPath: .objc_sel_namegrey or are these .objc_* symbols somehow special? > +SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 0.1 > SHARED_LIBS +=

Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile --- Makefile 25 Feb 2024 01:13:41 - 1.7 +++ Makefile 14 Apr 2024 19:58:35 - @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ COMMENT = portable,