On 2021/08/26 03:49, Wind R wrote:
> This is a minor update, mostly just deleting patches merged into upstream.
>
> ok?
Diff is not usable directly, protonmail usually corrupts the text part
of emails. Try as an attachment instead.
> Index: Makefile
>
This is a minor update, mostly just deleting patches merged into upstream.
ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libusb1/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -p -r1.34 Makefile
--- Makefile5 Aug 2020 13:59:36
On 2019/11/27 21:16, William Orr wrote:
>
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > The update looks better like this (I've only build-tested libusb1 itself
> > and *not* build or run tested any dependencies).
> >
> > But while we're there, the DEBUG handling isn't right, ports shouldn't
> > build additio
Stuart Henderson writes:
> The update looks better like this (I've only build-tested libusb1 itself
> and *not* build or run tested any dependencies).
>
> But while we're there, the DEBUG handling isn't right, ports shouldn't
> build additional things based on DEBUG being set (it's meant for set
Stuart Henderson writes:
> The update looks better like this (I've only build-tested libusb1 itself
> and *not* build or run tested any dependencies).
>
> But while we're there, the DEBUG handling isn't right, ports shouldn't
> build additional things based on DEBUG being set (it's meant for set
The update looks better like this (I've only build-tested libusb1 itself
and *not* build or run tested any dependencies).
But while we're there, the DEBUG handling isn't right, ports shouldn't
build additional things based on DEBUG being set (it's meant for setting
flags for the compiler/linker an
On 11/25/19 2:15 PM, William Orr wrote:
Brian Callahan writes:
On 2019-11-24 6:35 PM, William Orr wrote:
Hey,
This is an update to devel/libusb1 1.0.23.
Includes a switch to the github upstream, and features
some small changes to the build system.
Tested on amd64
Thanks!
Index: devel/l
Brian Callahan writes:
> On 2019-11-24 6:35 PM, William Orr wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> This is an update to devel/libusb1 1.0.23.
>>
>> Includes a switch to the github upstream, and features
>> some small changes to the build system.
>>
>> Tested on amd64
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Index: devel/libusb1/Makef
On 2019-11-24 6:35 PM, William Orr wrote:
Hey,
This is an update to devel/libusb1 1.0.23.
Includes a switch to the github upstream, and features
some small changes to the build system.
Tested on amd64
Thanks!
Index: devel/libusb1/Makefile
==
Hey,
This is an update to devel/libusb1 1.0.23.
Includes a switch to the github upstream, and features
some small changes to the build system.
Tested on amd64
Thanks!
Index: devel/libusb1/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:23:23PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > [..]
> > Is this a good candidate for tracking their github repo?
>
> You can use the diff below if you want. But I'd prefer to stick to
> stable releases. Thing is OpenBSD's backend is synchronous whereas
> the libusb advertis
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 23/06/15(Tue) 14:04, Brandon Mercer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 AM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>
>> > On 22/06/15(Mon) 23:56, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>> > > Martin Pieuchot writes:
>> > >
>> > > > Here's an update to the
On 23/06/15(Tue) 14:04, Brandon Mercer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 AM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> > On 22/06/15(Mon) 23:56, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> > > Martin Pieuchot writes:
> > >
> > > > Here's an update to the latest version. This diff is basically the
> > > > same as las
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 AM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 22/06/15(Mon) 23:56, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> > Martin Pieuchot writes:
> >
> > > Here's an update to the latest version. This diff is basically the
> > > same as last year and hopefully the regression exposed in the 1.0.18
>
On 22/06/15(Mon) 23:56, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot writes:
>
> > Here's an update to the latest version. This diff is basically the
> > same as last year and hopefully the regression exposed in the 1.0.18
> > are now gone.
> >
> > Please test with your favorite ports and r
Martin Pieuchot writes:
> Here's an update to the latest version. This diff is basically the
> same as last year and hopefully the regression exposed in the 1.0.18
> are now gone.
>
> Please test with your favorite ports and report back.
FWIW, the update looks sane ports-wise.
If you're still
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:17 AM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Here's an update to the latest version. This diff is basically the
> same as last year and hopefully the regression exposed in the 1.0.18
> are now gone.
>
> Please test with your favorite ports and report back.
>
>
I tested the teensyload
Here's an update to the latest version. This diff is basically the
same as last year and hopefully the regression exposed in the 1.0.18
are now gone.
Please test with your favorite ports and report back.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 04:51:06PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below is a major update to the last libusb (previously libusbx)
> release. Our backend has been updated upstream and this update
> includes various fixes. But since *a lot* of development happened
> since our previous package
David,
On 13/03/14(Thu) 17:04, David Coppa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2014/03/13 09:20, David Coppa wrote:
> >> And, please, tell me how to further debug this issue...
> >
> > See libusb1's Makefile; build libusb1 with DEBUG defined and
> > you get so
On 2014/03/13 09:20, David Coppa wrote:
> And, please, tell me how to further debug this issue...
See libusb1's Makefile; build libusb1 with DEBUG defined and
you get some additional logging.
> From: Martin Pieuchot
> Date: Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:51 PM
> Subject: Update: devel/libusb1
> To: ports@openbsd.org
>
>
> Diff below is a major update to the last libusb (previously libusbx)
> release. Our backend has been updated upstream and this update
> i
Diff below is a major update to the last libusb (previously libusbx)
release. Our backend has been updated upstream and this update
includes various fixes. But since *a lot* of development happened
since our previous packaged version, I'd like to hear from you, USB
users, to know if this new vers
The diff below updates devel/libusb1 to the recent 1.0.9 release.
All OpenBSD specific code has been commited upsteam and I don't expect
any regression but if you are using any application relying on the
libusb, please test this update.
Comments and oks welcome.
Martin
Index: Makefile
===
24 matches
Mail list logo
