> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > > Giovanni Bechis [2008-06-18, 12:53:39]:
> >> > > It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
> > >
> > > seems to work on amd64 too.
> > >
> > > however, it picks up libsamplerate if it's installed. others
> report
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 08:08:30 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> - specify license marker
It should be GPLv2+.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> Giovanni Bechis [2008-06-18, 12:53:39]:
> > It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
>
> seems to work on amd64 too.
>
> however, it picks up libsamplerate if it's installed. others reported that
> it does not make
Giovanni Bechis [2008-06-18, 12:53:39]:
> It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
seems to work on amd64 too.
however, it picks up libsamplerate if it's installed. others reported that
it does not make a difference, so maybe the configure script needs some
tweaking to avoid pickin
Matthew Clarke wrote:
You might want to add libsamplerate (audio/libsamplerate) to the port's
dependencies, as that library will be found and used if it is installed.
I could't tell that the presence of libsamplerate made any difference to
the few sounds that I've heard during testing so far, tho
On 2008/06/19 10:25, Matthew Clarke wrote:
> Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:53:39PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis may have written:
>
> > It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
> > Cheers
> > Giovanni
>
> [ snip patch ]
>
> Works well on i386 here.
>
> - connect to XP Pro on laptop
Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:53:39PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis may have written:
> It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
> Cheers
> Giovanni
[ snip patch ]
Works well on i386 here.
- connect to XP Pro on laptop at 1024x768
- connect to XP Pro on other laptop at 1680
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> If the purpose of a patch is obvious, there's no reason to add a
> comment. But sometimes it isn't obvious, or you're patching stuff
> you want to send to (and explain to) upstream later. For an example
> of missing comments, please look at the ghostscr
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:15:09PM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
> We don't usually include comments in the patch files.
To second Bernd's response:
If the purpose of a patch is obvious, there's no reason to add a
comment. But sometimes it isn't obvious, or you're patching stuff
you want to send to (a
It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/rdesktop/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 Makefile
--- Makefile15 Sep 2007 20:04:24 -
Will Maier [Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:15:09PM -0500] wrote:
>> Index: patches/patch-rdpsnd_sun_c
>> ===
>> RCS file: patches/patch-rdpsnd_sun_c
>> diff -N patches/patch-rdpsnd_sun_c
>> --- /dev/null1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
>> ++
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Devin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. I wasn't sure if PKGNAME should have the p0 appended or should it just
> be ${DISTNAME}.
PKGNAME can be unset, thereby reverting to DISTNAME. This is a new
version of the port, with no local patchlevel.
> 2. When addi
Hi Devin-
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:45:23AM -0700, Devin Smith wrote:
> Some questions I had:
>
> 1. I wasn't sure if PKGNAME should have the p0 appended or should it just
>be ${DISTNAME}.
The pN suffix is the port patchlevel; if you're bumping the upstream
version, you don't need it. Since
Here's an update for rdesktop from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0.
Here are the changes from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0:
Key changes:
* Fix for potential vulnerability against compromised/malicious
servers (reported by iDefense)
* Fix for crash with recent versions of X.Org
* Fix for connection to Windows 2008 Server
* A
14 matches
Mail list logo
