Omar Polo wrote:
> straightforward update; the changelog is here:
> https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/releases/tag/v0.2.18
>
> port-wise: switching from GH_* to the official tarball (the
> autogenerated one doesn't include the submodules) and removing msgpack
> as dependency (upstream switched
straightforward update; the changelog is here:
https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/releases/tag/v0.2.18
port-wise: switching from GH_* to the official tarball (the
autogenerated one doesn't include the submodules) and removing msgpack
as dependency (upstream switched to bundled cmp).
consumers bu
Hello ports,
Please find attached a diff to update net/toxcore to the latest release.
The changelog is available here:
https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/releases/tag/v0.2.17
it doesn't seem like a big update, but yet they added and removed
symbols so I had to bump the major.
frendly ping :)
Omar Polo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this updates toxcore and toxic to the latest releases, the changelog is
> here:
>
> https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/releases/tag/v0.2.16
> https://github.com/TokTok/toxic/releases/tag/v0.11.3
>
> It's a straightforward update, I've only tweaked
Hello,
this updates toxcore and toxic to the latest releases, the changelog is
here:
https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/releases/tag/v0.2.16
https://github.com/TokTok/toxic/releases/tag/v0.11.3
It's a straightforward update, I've only tweaked toxcore makefile to
avoid the otherwise unnecessary
Hello ports,
Here's another attempt at updating this port. There are three ports
depending on toxcore:
- net/toxic,no_x11 : I'm sending (in a separate email) a patch to
update it.
- net/utox : it builds and runs fine with this library update but it
segfaults on exit. Upstream has rel
Updated SHARED_LIBS
Can you tell, how one decides the version of a shared library.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile24 Nov 2019 23:05:10
On 3/30/2020 9:35 AM, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope this is final, Completed a full build
successfully, also ported the patch. Any user
can test audio-video.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
re
I hope this is final, Completed a full build
successfully, also ported the patch. Any user
can test audio-video.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Mak
The build is succesfull without the patch,
I don't understand why the patch is needed.
Is the patch file necessary?
I don't know much about the program.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:16:08AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> sorry putridsoul66 for the double emacs, I've forgot to CC ports
> (as always...)
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:54:23PM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Update net/toxcore to latest version-0.2.11
>
sorry putridsoul66 for the double emacs, I've forgot to CC ports
(as always...)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:54:23PM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote:
> Update net/toxcore to latest version-0.2.11
> There was a complaint in the mailing-list
> about toxcore not being updated, I h
Updated Plist
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile24 Nov 2019 23:05:10 - 1.7
+++ Makefile30 Mar 2020 08:51:33 -
@@ -2,8 +2,
Update net/toxcore to latest version-0.2.11
There was a complaint in the mailing-list
about toxcore not being updated, I hope
someone will tests this.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving
Hi!
Maybe it's too many ports in one mail, but I don't want to resend 3
different topics when these 3 ports are about the same thing and they
are simple.
Changelogs for both net/toxcore and net/toxic can be found here:
https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
https://github.co
ping
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.3 Makefile
> --- Makefile 9 Aug 2018 23:25:58
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:09:13PM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
> I think we're looking at two independent issues:
> 1. Does the bootstrap daemon work?
> 2. Does it work through init with a fancy rcctl script?
>
> The answer to question 1 is unequivocally "yes" since I was running it on my
> machi
On 2/6/19 11:15 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
Hi Brian!
First, I tried setting up daemon at init level, I added to
/usr/ports/infrastructure/db/user.list the following:
831 _toxdht _toxdht net/toxcore
Then I added toxdht.rc to net/toxcore/pkg with contents:
```
#!/bin/ksh
daemon="${TRUEPREFIX}/bi
Hi Brian!
First, I tried setting up daemon at init level, I added to
/usr/ports/infrastructure/db/user.list the following:
831 _toxdht _toxdht net/toxcore
Then I added toxdht.rc to net/toxcore/pkg with contents:
```
#!/bin/ksh
daemon="${TRUEPREFIX}/bin/tox-bootstrapd --config /etc/tox-bootstrapd.
Hi Leonid --
On 2/6/19 4:55 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
Hi!
While I was contributing to Ravenports, John Marino from DragonFly BSD
explained me why I should be maintainer. So I am willing to take back
maintainership of ports I submitted to this mailing list.
I disabled bootstrap daemon because it
Sorry, new diff, DHT_bootstrap binary is useless because it doesn't
work too. This should be final sane diff:
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.3 Makefile
---
Hi!
While I was contributing to Ravenports, John Marino from DragonFly BSD
explained me why I should be maintainer. So I am willing to take back
maintainership of ports I submitted to this mailing list.
I disabled bootstrap daemon because it doesn't work, it immediately
starts and exits with 0, n
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 06:30:49PM +0200, Neon King wrote:
> __Some thoughts about behaviour on ports__
>
> I'm not even a part of the team but i'll write down some thoughts
> __that are my own__
> and that came to me in regards of your recent posts.
> Feel free to insult me if it makes you better,
On 2018/09/09 18:30, Neon King wrote:
> What do you expect after what you did? Just post diffs like nothing
> happened?
> I wouldn't be surprised that despite the right point of your work, nobody
> would
> be like caring because nobody wants to deal with such egocentric and kiddish
> behaviour . I'
__Some thoughts about behaviour on ports__
I'm not even a part of the team but i'll write down some thoughts
__that are my own__
and that came to me in regards of your recent posts.
Feel free to insult me if it makes you better, that won't solve anything .
And
frankly speaking i wouldn't care.
La
Yo!
Please stop being dinosaur and update c-toxcore port to 0.2.7 release.
Full changelog here: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/releases
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff
Yo!
While you were ignoring my update to 0.2.4, c-toxcore 0.2.5 is released.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.2 Makefile
--- Makefile26 Jun 2018 20:34:04
Ping?
From: Leonid Bobrov
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.2 Makefile
--- Makefile26 Jun 2018 20
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.2 Makefile
--- Makefile26 Jun 2018 20:34:04 - 1.2
+++ Makefile23 Jul 2018 21:25:40 -
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@
Sorry, after removing patches directory, cvs diff didn't generate patch
for removed files:
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
--- Makefile
Hi!
Finally I can remove patches taken from upstream:
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/toxcore/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
--- Makefile29 Apr 2018 11:14:09 - 1.1.
31 matches
Mail list logo
