On Sat, 21 Nov 2020, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Simple update to 1.1.2, OK?
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mcabber/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.38
> diff -u -p -u -r1.38 Makefile
> --- Makefile 12 J
you were right, I just committed it with your tweak thanks!
On 20:24 Sun 22 Nov , Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Yes, but make lib-depends-check complains:
>
> Missing: panel.6 (/usr/local/bin/mcabber) (system lib)
> Extra: panelw.6
> WANTLIB += panel
> Scanning: ok
>
> So with the slight change
Hi,
Simple update to 1.1.2, OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mcabber/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -u -r1.38 Makefile
--- Makefile12 Jul 2019 20:48:32 - 1.38
+++ Makefile20 Nov 2020 2
You're right, don't know why but it said that it was on last revision.
Well... Any other OKs?
On 14:02 Mon 10 Jul , Markus Hennecke wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
>
> > Hi ports@
> >
> > Please find attached an update to mcabber 1.1.0, it includes a new vi
> > mode and
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> Hi ports@
>
> Please find attached an update to mcabber 1.1.0, it includes a new vi
> mode and some bugfixes.
>
> OK?
Yes please. But your patch is not against -current (Makefile version
1.31)?
Index: Makefile
==
Hi ports@
Please find attached an update to mcabber 1.1.0, it includes a new vi
mode and some bugfixes.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mcabber/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -u -r1.30 Makefile
--- Ma
Yes, I have this running for a few days and see no regression.
Please commit this.
Thanks Ricardo!
Markus
Am 10.01.2017 um 11:15 schrieb Ricardo Mestre:
Hi ports@
This updates mcabber to latest version 1.0.4 which includes an important bugfix
The bug is described in CVE-2015-8688 and althoug
[ ... ]
>> As it was my first patch ever, I did it from scratch (the plist part
>> was my fault).
>
> Looks good!
@all thanks for help and feedback.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> > You'll learn soon that sending patches as attachments is a wonderful
> > way to get people angry.
>
> Sorry, was not my intention. I saw often attachments so, I thought it
> is the prefered way. I also like inline things more.
>
> > These lines
> You'll learn soon that sending patches as attachments is a wonderful
> way to get people angry.
Sorry, was not my intention. I saw often attachments so, I thought it
is the prefered way. I also like inline things more.
> These lines were in PLIST on purpose. If "make update-plist" deletes
> th
You'll learn soon that sending patches as attachments is a wonderful way
to get people angry.
Christoph R. Murauer said:
> configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-gtk-doc
That's fine.
| --- pkg/PLIST 10 Nov 2015 20:38:19 - 1.7
| +++ pkg/PLIST 7 Feb 2016 23:05:08 -
[...]
Hello Stuart !
Hello Michael !
Thanks for your answers and your help.
> Just rm distinfo; make makesum is likely to help.
Yep, does the trick.
> make distclean
Was also useful.
Markus Hennecke is the maintainer of the port so, I send the message
also in /cc to him. Maybe he or someone else co
Here is an update to mcabber 1.0.0. OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mcabber/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -p -u -r1.22 Makefile
--- Makefile24 Mar 2015 22:45:07 - 1.22
+++ Makefile4 Nov 201
13 matches
Mail list logo