On Thu Dec 07, 2017 at 04:22:17PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:07:55PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Thu Dec 07, 2017 at 03:32:02PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > > On Mon Dec 04, 2017 at 10
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:07:55PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu Dec 07, 2017 at 03:32:02PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > On Mon Dec 04, 2017 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > >
On Thu Dec 07, 2017 at 03:32:02PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 04, 2017 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > please find blow a straightforward update to synfigstudio and all direct
>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Mon Dec 04, 2017 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please find blow a straightforward update to synfigstudio and all direct
> > dependencies. Synfigstudio will not build with upcoming boost and an
>
On Mon Dec 04, 2017 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please find blow a straightforward update to synfigstudio and all direct
> dependencies. Synfigstudio will not build with upcoming boost and an
> update is easier than patch.
>
> I'd like to see it soon in the tree to g
Hi all,
please find blow a straightforward update to synfigstudio and all direct
dependencies. Synfigstudio will not build with upcoming boost and an
update is easier than patch.
I'd like to see it soon in the tree to go forward with my boost update.
Comments? Test? Oks?
Works fine here with cu
