On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:28:35PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Updated diff to llvm/clang 3.0 final; I have made a few timings (on amd64) -
FWIW, I successfully built llvm 3.0 on sparc64.
Regards,
Simon
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 15:17 CET, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2011/12/06 13:23, David Coppa wrote:
> > > Try to add the chunk below to Makefile:
> > >
> > > .ifdef DEBUG
> > > CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols
>
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/12/06 13:23, David Coppa wrote:
> > Try to add the chunk below to Makefile:
> >
> > .ifdef DEBUG
> > CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols
> > .endif
> >
> > Ciao,
> > David
>
> This is only with the cmake build, not
On 2011/12/06 13:23, David Coppa wrote:
> Try to add the chunk below to Makefile:
>
> .ifdef DEBUG
> CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols
> .endif
>
> Ciao,
> David
This is only with the cmake build, not the autoconf one ..
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 13:23 CET, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>
> > It works for me on i386, and also it compiles fast. Whatever made the rc
> > candidates so slow, seems to be gone.
> >
> > I also found why llvm did not compiled for me with
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> It works for me on i386, and also it compiles fast. Whatever made the rc
> candidates so slow, seems to be gone.
>
> I also found why llvm did not compiled for me with cmake (I reported that
> before when you sent the rc2 I think):
> In my /etc
On 2011/12/06 12:41, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> I also found why llvm did not compiled for me with cmake (I reported that
> before when you sent the rc2 I think):
> In my /etc/mk.conf I had defined:
> DEBUG=-g -O0
-O0 - this could very well explain why it was so slow ...
personally I would usu
Hi,
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 22:28 CET, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2011-11-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> > On 2011-
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 22:28 CET, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2011-11-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> > On 2011-10-2
On 2011-11-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>> > > attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3
Hi,
On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
> > > be released in a couple of weeks
On 2011/11/24 09:47, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> This rc4 builds fine for me on i386, not like the rc3 from Sthen.
rc4 builds fine on i386 with cmake too.
> I guess it will also not build on sparc64, see this bug I created in their
> bug tracker:
I tested rc3 build on sparc64, that does work
On 2011/11/24 14:21, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
> > > be released in a couple of weeks
> >
> > release is scheduled f
On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
> > > be released in a couple of weeks
> >
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
> > be released in a couple of weeks
>
> release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated diff for rc3,
> also s
Hi,
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:33 CET, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
> > be released in a couple of weeks
>
> release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated diff for rc3
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>> attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
>> be released in a couple of weeks
>
> release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated diff for rc3,
> also switching th
On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to
> be released in a couple of weeks
release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated diff for rc3,
also switching the build to cmake.
any opinions on splitting clang off into a separ
Hi,
attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in
a couple of weeks, so I thought, good time to test, and report back
regressions, so that they maybe get fixed for the release.
report bugs/problems there:
http://www.llvm.org/bugs/
I use it to test compiling x1
19 matches
Mail list logo
