On 2024/04/16 12:57, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:46:36PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I tried running some of the
> > tcl/wish based examples; they fail on both 10.0.1 and 7.1.0. Since that's
> > not a regression from the existing version I don't think it's a blocker
> > s
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:46:36PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I tried running some of the
> tcl/wish based examples; they fail on both 10.0.1 and 7.1.0. Since that's
> not a regression from the existing version I don't think it's a blocker
> so ok with me.
Thanks for testing.
I wonder if th
On 2024/04/16 11:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Diff follows. Let me know if I missed anything. Cheers
I've built and done some quick tests on arm64. Things I tried that are
already working on 7.1.0 are OK here too. I tried running some of the
tcl/wish based examples; they fail on both 10.0.1 and 7.1.0.
Hi,
Here's an update to the latest graphviz.
Notes:
- Used check_sym to help decide what to bump.
- The only non-plugin shared libs that didn't remove symbols was libxdot.
Diffing the xdot header, it only removes the def of a macro:
-#define INITIAL_XDOT_CAPACITY 512
In the old ver
