[UPDATE] devel/check (0.12.0 -> 0.15.2)

2021-01-12 Thread Alex Naumov
Greetings, this patch updates check (Unit Testing Framework for C) to version 0.15.2. 'portcheck', 'port-lib-depends-check' and 'update-plist' returns 0. Updated and tested on aarch64 (SoftIron Overdrive 1000). All tests are OK: ===> Regression tests for check-0.15.2 Making check in lib Making

Re: [UPDATE] devel/check 0.10.0 => 0.12.0

2019-05-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/05/20 11:24, Peter Ezetta wrote: > Ping :) > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:25 AM Peter Ezetta wrote: > > > Hi Stuart, > > > > Sorry about that, I have attached a diff instead of pasting it this time. > > > > There are quite a few changes over the last few releases. Change notes are > > ava

Re: [UPDATE] devel/check 0.10.0 => 0.12.0

2019-05-20 Thread Peter Ezetta
Ping :) On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:25 AM Peter Ezetta wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > Sorry about that, I have attached a diff instead of pasting it this time. > > There are quite a few changes over the last few releases. Change notes are > available here: https://libcheck.github.io/check/NEWS > > - Pete

Re: [UPDATE] devel/check 0.10.0 => 0.12.0

2019-05-16 Thread Peter Ezetta
Hi Stuart, Sorry about that, I have attached a diff instead of pasting it this time. There are quite a few changes over the last few releases. Change notes are available here: https://libcheck.github.io/check/NEWS - Peter On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:24 AM Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/05/

Re: [UPDATE] devel/check 0.10.0 => 0.12.0

2019-05-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/05/15 09:55, Peter Ezetta wrote: > Hello Ports, > > The following diff updates devel/check from v0.10.0 to 0.12.0, as well as > updating the master site from SourceForge to GitHub. This change was > required for a personal project which utilizes the ck_assert_ldouble_* > macros, which were

[UPDATE] devel/check 0.10.0 => 0.12.0

2019-05-15 Thread Peter Ezetta
Hello Ports, The following diff updates devel/check from v0.10.0 to 0.12.0, as well as updating the master site from SourceForge to GitHub. This change was required for a personal project which utilizes the ck_assert_ldouble_* macros, which were introduced in 0.11.0. I was unsure whether modifyin

UPDATE: devel/check

2009-10-03 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Hi, This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.8. Tested on amd64/sparc64. Comments ? OK ? Cheers, benoit Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/ports/devel/check/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/09/23 17:37, Brad wrote: > On Wednesday 23 September 2009 02:01:27 Benoit Lecocq wrote: > > Brad wrote: > > > On Tuesday 22 September 2009 09:15:22 Benoit Lecocq wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. > > >> Tested on amd64/sparc64. > > >> > > >

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-23 Thread Brad
On Wednesday 23 September 2009 02:01:27 Benoit Lecocq wrote: > Brad wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 September 2009 09:15:22 Benoit Lecocq wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. > >> Tested on amd64/sparc64. > >> > >> Comments ? OK ? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> benoit > >

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/09/23 08:04, Benoit Lecocq wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2009/09/22 15:15, Benoit Lecocq wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. > >> Tested on amd64/sparc64. > >> > >> Comments ? OK ? > > > > there are a few failures in the regression tests

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-22 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009/09/22 15:15, Benoit Lecocq wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. >> Tested on amd64/sparc64. >> >> Comments ? OK ? > > there are a few failures in the regression tests since 0.9.6.. > I'm slightly worried about adding pthread wit

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-22 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Brad wrote: > On Tuesday 22 September 2009 09:15:22 Benoit Lecocq wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. >> Tested on amd64/sparc64. >> >> Comments ? OK ? >> >> Cheers, >> benoit > > Your use of CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS is wrong. Also why is this being added? I see > no n

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-22 Thread Brad
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 09:15:22 Benoit Lecocq wrote: > Hi, > > This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. > Tested on amd64/sparc64. > > Comments ? OK ? > > Cheers, > benoit Your use of CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS is wrong. Also why is this being added? I see no new external dependencies. --

Re: UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/09/22 15:15, Benoit Lecocq wrote: > Hi, > > This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. > Tested on amd64/sparc64. > > Comments ? OK ? there are a few failures in the regression tests since 0.9.6.. I'm slightly worried about adding pthread with the non-blocking semantics discuss

UPDATE: devel/check

2009-09-22 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Hi, This diff updates check to the latest release 0.9.7. Tested on amd64/sparc64. Comments ? OK ? Cheers, benoit Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/ports/devel/check/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile