On 2024/08/02 18:45, Robert Palm wrote:
>
> Zitat von Thomas Frohwein :
>
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Thomas Frohwein :
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >
Zitat von Thomas Frohwein :
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
Quoting Thomas Frohwein :
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know why, the following libs are named
> >
> > libSDL2_image.so.1.1
> > libSD
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
>
> Quoting Thomas Frohwein :
>
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to know why, the following libs are named
> > >
> > > libSDL2_image.so.1.1
> > > libSDL2_ttf.so
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
>
> Quoting Thomas Frohwein :
>
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to know why, the following libs are named
> > >
> > > libSDL2_image.so.1.1
> > > libSDL2_ttf.so
Quoting Thomas Frohwein :
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know why, the following libs are named
libSDL2_image.so.1.1
libSDL2_ttf.so.0.1
and not
libSDL2_image-2.0.so.0
libSDL2_ttf-2.0.so.0
Ports:
devel/sdl2-image
devel/sdl2_ttf
Is it bec
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:48:31PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know why, the following libs are named
>
> libSDL2_image.so.1.1
> libSDL2_ttf.so.0.1
>
> and not
>
> libSDL2_image-2.0.so.0
> libSDL2_ttf-2.0.so.0
>
> Ports:
> devel/sdl2-image
> devel/sdl2_ttf
>
> Is it
Hi,
I would like to know why, the following libs are named
libSDL2_image.so.1.1
libSDL2_ttf.so.0.1
and not
libSDL2_image-2.0.so.0
libSDL2_ttf-2.0.so.0
Ports:
devel/sdl2-image
devel/sdl2_ttf
Is it because of CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX ? How does it work?
Thank you.