On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:57:47AM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> If it isn't trivial which subpackages need a bump, just bump all
> of them. And I would just use a global REVISION instead of adding
> a REVISION-foo line for each subpackage.
Agreed, OK kn.
Theo Buehler:
> > The REVISION bumps are what portbump suggested. Not sure all of them are
> > needed.
>
> I've got an ok from jsing@ on the actual diff and would like to commit
> soon. We're both unsure about the bumping. If it is desirable to bump
> only some parts, please let me know which one
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:02:23PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> These are about the BIO_meth_* family of functions which we have for
> half a year or so.
>
> The REVISION bumps are what portbump suggested. Not sure all of them are
> needed.
I've got an ok from jsing@ on the actual diff and would
These are about the BIO_meth_* family of functions which we have for
half a year or so.
The REVISION bumps are what portbump suggested. Not sure all of them are
needed.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/databases/postgresq
