Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-31 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:19:24AM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:23:35 +0200, > Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:20:23 +0200, > > Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > > > > The good news 7.5 contains 7.4.2 which seems to be immune. > > > > > > > o

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-31 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:20:23AM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:18:27 +0200, > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 11:49:29PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > ports@, > > > > > > I'd like to update www/varnish to 7.7.0 > > > > > > I

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-30 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:23:35 +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:20:23 +0200, > Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > > The good news 7.5 contains 7.4.2 which seems to be immune. > > > > or not and they just used poor wording: > > Versions affected > - Varnish Cache release

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2025/03/30 23:18, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 11:49:29PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > ports@, > > > > I'd like to update www/varnish to 7.7.0 > > > > It builds and passed trivial testing on -current/amd64. > > > > I also sucefully used to build it my cust

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-30 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 00:20:23 +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > The good news 7.5 contains 7.4.2 which seems to be immune. > or not and they just used poor wording: Versions affected - Varnish Cache release 7.5.0 - Varnish Cache release 7.6.0 - Varnish Cache release 7.6.1 - Older unsuppor

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-30 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 11:49:29PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > ports@, > > I'd like to update www/varnish to 7.7.0 > > It builds and passed trivial testing on -current/amd64. > > I also sucefully used to build it my custom vmod. > > Ok? Either this or an update to 7.6.2 would solve CVE-

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.7.0

2025-03-30 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:18:27 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 11:49:29PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > ports@, > > > > I'd like to update www/varnish to 7.7.0 > > > > It builds and passed trivial testing on -current/amd64. > > > > I also sucefully used

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.6.0

2024-11-08 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Fri, 08 Nov 2024 20:16:11 +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > 08.11.2024 21:53, Kirill A. Korinsky пишет: > > ports@, Gonzalo, > > > > Today a new version of varnish was released. > > > > Changelog quite small: > > > > Varnish Cache 7.6.1 (2024-11-08) > > - Fixed a bug introduced in 7.6.0 that

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.6.0

2024-11-08 Thread Klemens Nanni
08.11.2024 21:53, Kirill A. Korinsky пишет: > ports@, Gonzalo, > > Today a new version of varnish was released. > > Changelog quite small: > > Varnish Cache 7.6.1 (2024-11-08) > - Fixed a bug introduced in 7.6.0 that could trigger a panic when using >dynamic backends (4183). > - Resolved a

Re: www/varnish: update to 7.6.0

2024-11-08 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
ports@, Gonzalo, Today a new version of varnish was released. Changelog quite small: Varnish Cache 7.6.1 (2024-11-08) - Fixed a bug introduced in 7.6.0 that could trigger a panic when using dynamic backends (4183). - Resolved a race condition that caused Varnish to exceed the connection

Re: www/varnish

2009-01-18 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Jim, thanks for answering. On Sun, 18.01.2009 at 12:30:41 -0500, Jim Razmus wrote: > Varnish is a reverse caching HTTP proxy more or less. It allocates a > chunk memory and then caches the output from backend web servers to > serve future requests itself. It's like squid, but arguably more

Re: www/varnish

2009-01-18 Thread Jim Razmus
* Toni Mueller [090118 11:42]: > > Hi Jim, > > thanks for posting. > > On Sat, 17.01.2009 at 23:06:38 -0500, Jim Razmus wrote: > > I dropped the maintainer line from the Makefile. I've gone with Movable > > Type and don't need or want an HTTP accelerator anymore. > > This caught my curiosity

Re: www/varnish

2009-01-18 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Jim, thanks for posting. On Sat, 17.01.2009 at 23:06:38 -0500, Jim Razmus wrote: > I dropped the maintainer line from the Makefile. I've gone with Movable > Type and don't need or want an HTTP accelerator anymore. This caught my curiosity. What were you using Varnish for, before? I'm also