On 05/21/10 12:21, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be p
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts
> > wrote:
> >> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
> >> in the attic?
> >
> >
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts
> > wrote:
> >> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
> >> in the attic?
> >
> >
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts
> wrote:
>> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
>> in the attic?
>
> Nope. 3.6 doesn't support Java plug-in.
how is that a negative? ;)
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
> in the attic?
>
> --
> The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org
>
>
Nope. 3.6 doesn't support Java plug-in.
. Ken
On 2009/12/18 14:20, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Christian Weisgerber
> wrote:
> > I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
> > of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
> > distinfo update. *Except* that it wants sqli
On 2009/12/18 22:36, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
> of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
> distinfo update. *Except* that it wants sqlite 3.6.16.1 or better
> and our sqlite port is at 3.6.16. I can't fin
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Christian Weisgerber
wrote:
> I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
> of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
> distinfo update. *Except* that it wants sqlite 3.6.16.1 or better
> and our sqlite port is at 3.6.16.
Mozilla 3.5 seems quite unstable.
It crashes on Windows XP too.
> It crashes for me too, on CURRENT i386
>
> can anyone confirm if this is a FreeBSD only bug?
>
> eg does it crash in Linux or in OSX?
>
>
> Sam Fourman Jr.
>
>
On 03.07.2009, at 07:31, David Coppa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr.
wrote:
eg does it crash in Linux or in OSX?
Does not crash in Linux (tested just now on latest Ubuntu @ my
employer)
Neither under OSX
regards
Karl-Heinz
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryp
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> eg does it crash in Linux or in OSX?
Does not crash in Linux (tested just now on latest Ubuntu @ my employer)
cheers,
David
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>
>> It crashes for me too, on CURRENT i386
>> can anyone confirm if this is a FreeBSD only bug?
>
> An OpenBSD list is probably a bad place to ask this.
My bad, there is a similar thread on a FreeBSD list,
I jus
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> It crashes for me too, on CURRENT i386
> can anyone confirm if this is a FreeBSD only bug?
An OpenBSD list is probably a bad place to ask this.
(It crashes on FreeBSD unless you have POSIX 1003.1b semaphores in
your kernel. kldload sem.)
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerb
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Aaron Stellman a écrit :
>>
>> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
>> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
>> page with such element.
>> example page on which it crashes:
>> http://www.double.c
Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
> page with such element.
Yes, it does.
Note that the firefox35 port is not for general use. It is for
people who want to find (and maybe even fix
On Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 01:47:42AM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
>> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
>> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
>> page with such element.
>> example page on which
Gilles Chehade a écrit :
Aaron Stellman a écrit :
Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
page with such element.
example page on which it crashes:
http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
Can anyone else co
Aaron Stellman a écrit :
Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
page with such element.
example page on which it crashes:
http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
Can anyone else confirm such behavior?
y
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
> page with such element.
> example page on which it crashes:
> http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
>
> Can
19 matches
Mail list logo
