Re: webmail

2018-01-23 Thread Craig Skinner
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:33:30 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > What do people use as a light-weight webmail Base ssh & packaged mutt. (Works fine with PuTTY on Widows, etc.) Cheers, -- Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7

Re: webmail

2018-01-23 Thread Bruno Flueckiger
On 22.01.2018 17:33, Jan Stary wrote: What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd? Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox? Thanks, Jan I use RoundCube as the web interface to the Dovecot IMAP server. OpenSMTPD delivers the mails using LMT

Re: webmail

2018-01-23 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:29:25AM +0100, Sol??ne Rapenne wrote: > Le 2018-01-22 17:33, Jan Stary a ??crit??: > > What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd? > > Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jan > > Hello, > > You

Re: webmail

2018-01-23 Thread Solène Rapenne
Le 2018-01-22 17:33, Jan Stary a écrit : What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd? Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox? Thanks, Jan Hello, You can try https://www.mailpile.is/ it's a webmail intended to be used by only one person, i

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Tue, January 23, 2018 03:00, trondd wrote: > On Mon, January 22, 2018 3:02 pm, Thuban wrote: >> >> I also like the old style of squirrelmail, not packaged under OpenBSd >> but who might work. >> > > It does. That is what I currently use with www/links+ for a nice > javascript free interface. >

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread trondd
On Mon, January 22, 2018 3:02 pm, Thuban wrote: > > I also like the old style of squirrelmail, not packaged under OpenBSd > but who might work. > It does. That is what I currently use with www/links+ for a nice javascript free interface. Hasn't been a release in many years and I'm not sure if it

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread James Turner
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:06:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/01/22 19:03, Thuban wrote: > > rainloop. > > > > It looks nice and is easy to setup. They seem vey fond of md5 > though, even with the per-server salt they use md5 has not really been > good enough for some time. And

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread Thuban
There was prayer webmail, but doesn't seem available anymore. That was the previous URL : http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~dpc22/prayer/ (used to be mentionned by suckless people : https://lists.suckless.org/wiki/1506/1847.html) I also like the old style of squirrelmail, not packaged under Open

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/01/22 19:03, Thuban wrote: > rainloop. > It looks nice and is easy to setup. They seem vey fond of md5 though, even with the per-server salt they use md5 has not really been good enough for some time. And they haven't learned about not including config directories under the web root..

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread lvdd
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:19:36 +0100 Gilles Chehade wrote: > > custom webmail, not quite ready to be used by others. > but you will release it to the public at some point, right?? That would be fantastic - a webmail client made by the same people that created opensmtpd. That is probably somethin

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread Thuban
rainloop.

Re: webmail

2018-01-22 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:33:30PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd? > custom webmail, not quite ready to be used by others. > Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox? > nope, it can store in Maildir or mbox, what I do is have i