Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee-facebook 1.2.1p0 -> 1.2.2

2021-03-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
Thanks, committed. On 2021/03/20 19:30, Eivind Eide wrote: > Bumping this as I would like to see bitlbee-facebook updated to the > latest release before 6.9. > Tested much longer now. Works fine. > > tor. 18. feb. 2021 kl. 18:26 skrev Eivind Eide : > > > > bitlbee-facebook-1.2.2 > > > > faceb

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee-facebook 1.2.1p0 -> 1.2.2

2021-03-20 Thread Eivind Eide
Bumping this as I would like to see bitlbee-facebook updated to the latest release before 6.9. Tested much longer now. Works fine. tor. 18. feb. 2021 kl. 18:26 skrev Eivind Eide : > > bitlbee-facebook-1.2.2 > > facebook-api: Fix id assertion in fb_api_cb_publish_mst() (#204) > Increase syn

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee-facebook 1.2.0 -> 1.2.1

2021-01-09 Thread Eivind Eide
Ping? Tested longer on amd64 now. No problems. tor. 22. okt. 2020 kl. 03:36 skrev Eivind Eide : > > bitlbee-facebook-1.2.1 (2020-10-20): > - Fix "Parse error: unexpected identifier 'taNewMessage'" > - Fix "Failed to read thrift: facebook-api.c:1929 fb_api_cb_publish_pt: > assertion 'fb_thr

Re: Update: net/bitlbee-facebook 1.1.2 -> 1.2.0

2019-07-09 Thread Klemens Nanni
Committed, thanks.

Re: update net/bitlbee

2019-04-21 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 06:41:40PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote: > update bitlbee to 3.6 and uses https Keeps working for me, OK kn. > HOMEPAGE=http://bitlbee.org/ Has TLS as well.

Re: update net/bitlbee

2019-04-21 Thread Nam Nguyen
Tom Doherty writes: > maintainer ok > >> On 19 Apr 2019, at 17:41, Solene Rapenne wrote: >> >> update bitlbee to 3.6 and uses https >> >> commit list at the bottom of the mail after the diff. >> >> I don't use bitlbee, but the service starts and bitlbee-facebook >> compiles fine too. >> >> I p

Re: update net/bitlbee

2019-04-19 Thread Tom Doherty
maintainer ok > On 19 Apr 2019, at 17:41, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > update bitlbee to 3.6 and uses https > > commit list at the bottom of the mail after the diff. > > I don't use bitlbee, but the service starts and bitlbee-facebook > compiles fine too. > > I plan to look at bitblee-mastodon a

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee-facebook

2017-10-11 Thread Michal Mazurek
On 00:06:01, 11.10.17, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > You forgot to remove REVISION. Thanks, fixed. Index: net/bitlbee-facebook//Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/bitlbee-facebook/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.2 Mak

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee-facebook

2017-10-10 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Tue Oct 10, 2017 at 10:10:45AM +, Michal Mazurek wrote: > The previous version stopped working. > > OK? > > Index: net/bitlbee-facebook/Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/bitlbee-facebook/Makefile,v > retrieving revisio

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2017-05-28 Thread Tom Doherty
Maintainer ok > On 28 May 2017, at 21:59, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > This adds an rc script to bitlbee (using the -F flag, "Run in ForkDaemon > mode. This is similar to ordinary daemon mode, but every client gets its > own process" which seemed the sanest option). Then there doesn't seem > much

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2017-05-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
This adds an rc script to bitlbee (using the -F flag, "Run in ForkDaemon mode. This is similar to ordinary daemon mode, but every client gets its own process" which seemed the sanest option). Then there doesn't seem much need to document inetd setup, so remove it from README. Tweak the other bit of

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2017-05-26 Thread Michal Mazurek
As Stuart pointed out, add the MODPY_RUNDEP = No setting. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/bitlbee/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.58 diff -u -p -r1.58 Makefile --- Makefile19 Jul 2015 08:22:14 - 1.58 +++ Mak

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2017-05-26 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:32:08PM +0200, Michal Mazurek wrote: For what it's worth, my patch[0] in early april has some additional changes that could be merged. 0: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=149174357820533&w=2 Thanks, fixed version: Index: Makefile =

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2017-05-26 Thread Michal Mazurek
Thanks, fixed version: Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/bitlbee/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.58 diff -u -p -r1.58 Makefile --- Makefile19 Jul 2015 08:22:14 - 1.58 +++ Makefile26 May 2017 15:30:26 -

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2017-05-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/05/26 15:27, Michal Mazurek wrote: > Update to 3.5.1. Changelog for 3.4.1 states: > Building documentation is now done with a python script (both 2.x/3.x > work) Asciidoc/xsltproc/xmlto are no longer build dependencies (dx) > > Many thanks to fcambus@ for helping me to get this complet

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee => 3.4

2015-05-13 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Committed. Thanks, -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee => 3.4

2015-05-13 Thread Tom Doherty
Hi I tested with my usual bitlbee-libpurple/pidgin-sipe Cheers Tom Sent from my iPhone > On 13 May 2015, at 18:43, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote: > > Hey! > > Oh, I'm afraid I missed the previous submission. > >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:23:22PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: >> I can c

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee => 3.4

2015-05-13 Thread Henrik Friedrichsen
Hey! Oh, I'm afraid I missed the previous submission. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:23:22PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > I can commit this if I get explicit test reports. Can I have a rough > idea of which protocols were tested? I have been using this since I sent it in with the XMPP a

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee => 3.4

2015-05-13 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Hi, Henrik Friedrichsen writes: > Oops. Looks like the first message did not get to the list. > Here is the patch one more time.. I see that Tom Doherty (cc'ed) had already sent an update to 3.4, including a tweak to remove MSN from COMMENT[1]. I can commit this if I get explicit test reports

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee => 3.4

2015-05-11 Thread Henrik Friedrichsen
Oops. Looks like the first message did not get to the list. Here is the patch one more time.. On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 01:03:52PM +0200, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote: > ping? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/bitlbee/Makefile,v

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee => 3.4

2015-05-10 Thread Henrik Friedrichsen
ping?

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-30 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On v, jan 27, 2013 at 16:13:24 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote: > Here's one that makes sure the otr FLAVOR continues to work: [...] This also works for me. Daniel -- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-27 Thread Okan Demirmen
Here's one that makes sure the otr FLAVOR continues to work: Cheers, Okan Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/open/anoncvs/cvs/ports/net/bitlbee/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u -p -r1.46 Makefile --- Makefile27 Nov 20

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-19 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:48:13PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote: > Hi - Missed this thread; however, I see 1 or 2 diff's - is there one > complete diff? And on what networks/servers has the openssl switch > been tested? (I don't have have accounts on all networks to test > myself :)) Re ssl, i've o

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-19 Thread Okan Demirmen
Hi - Missed this thread; however, I see 1 or 2 diff's - is there one complete diff? And on what networks/servers has the openssl switch been tested? (I don't have have accounts on all networks to test myself :)) Cheers, Okan On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Tom Doherty wrote: > I like it a lot.

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-17 Thread Tom Doherty
I like it a lot. Okan? :-) On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > On sze, jan 09, 2013 at 19:30:17 +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:34:10PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > > > On sze, jan 09, 2013 at 10:35:00 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > On 201

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-10 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On sze, jan 09, 2013 at 19:30:17 +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:34:10PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > > On sze, jan 09, 2013 at 10:35:00 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2013/01/09 10:11, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > > [...] > > > > I've been meaning to ask if it would be o

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-09 Thread Landry Breuil
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:34:10PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > On sze, jan 09, 2013 at 10:35:00 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2013/01/09 10:11, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > [...] > > > I've been meaning to ask if it would be okay to drop the gnutls dep., > > > and switch bitlbee to OpenSSL. I've

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-09 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On sze, jan 09, 2013 at 10:35:00 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/01/09 10:11, LEVAI Daniel wrote: [...] > > I've been meaning to ask if it would be okay to drop the gnutls dep., > > and switch bitlbee to OpenSSL. I've been using it with it since 3.0 beta > > times and never had a problem,

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/01/09 10:11, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > On k, jan 08, 2013 at 21:36:53 +, Tom Doherty wrote: > > Hi > > Update net/bitlbee to 3.2: > [...] > > Works for me with msn/jabber/oscar/sipe > [...] > > Hi! > > It seems that this works here also; only tested msn, jabber and oscar > protocols with

Re: [UPDATE] net/bitlbee

2013-01-09 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On k, jan 08, 2013 at 21:36:53 +, Tom Doherty wrote: > Hi > Update net/bitlbee to 3.2: [...] > Works for me with msn/jabber/oscar/sipe [...] Hi! It seems that this works here also; only tested msn, jabber and oscar protocols with the otr flavor. I've been meaning to ask if it would be okay t

Re: update: net/bitlbee

2011-12-15 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On cs, dec 15, 2011 at 16:54:42 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote: > update to 3.0.4. > > testing, comments and oks. > Working great on i386. I've been using it for a solid week now, with the otr flavor. Tested with Jabber, MSN, iCQ, and no problem so far. Daniel -- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B6

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-04-10 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Andrew Dalgleish [Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:05:04AM +1000] wrote: >On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 07:08:27PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> Is there any reason to keep the no_ssl flavor now? > >Hmm. I don't think so. That was added because gnutls didn't work on sparc64. >I've removed that, and added

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-04-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Andrew Dalgleish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PORT: net/bitlbee > > COMMENT: > bitlbee 1.0.2 > > Tested on > i386 -current Actually, this doesn't build for me. The prototypes for http_{de,en}code() in util.h specify only a single argument. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-04-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Andrew Dalgleish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PORT: net/bitlbee > > COMMENT: > bitlbee 1.0.2 > -LIB_DEPENDS+=gnutls.8::security/gnutls > -WANTLIB+=gcrypt gpg-error > +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --ssl=openssl > +WANTLIB+=crypto ssl Is there any reason to keep th

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-04-09 Thread viq
On Monday 06 March 2006 22:19, Andrew Dalgleish wrote: > As Will Maier pointed out, it doesn't work. > > I used 'cvs diff -uwN' instead of 'cvs diff -uN'. > Faulty finger macros. > > > Regards, > Andrew Dalgleish Any particular reason why nothing is happening with this update? (speaking of, just

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-03-10 Thread viq
i386 current from Feb 19, compiled and upgraded fine, added account for jabber via ssl, that and MSN connection seem to work. -- viq - Toshiba i FIFA World Cup Wygraj bilety i notebooki z Intel Centrino Duo Mobile Technology ht

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-03-07 Thread Josh Rivel
Seems to be working fine for me, i386-current as of Feb 26th. Thanks! Josh

Re: UPDATE: net/bitlbee

2006-03-06 Thread Will Maier
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:19:59AM +1100, Andrew Dalgleish wrote: > I used 'cvs diff -uwN' instead of 'cvs diff -uN'. > Faulty finger macros. Patched port upgrades just fine. Jabber, AIM and Yahoo transports all appear to be working (as is Google Chat); SSL is enabled. Thanks, Andrew! # unam