On Thu 2008.11.06 at 08:20 +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Okan Demirmen wrote:
>
> > new diff, plus a few others.
> >
> > graphics_ImageMagick.diff:
> > - update ImageMagick to 6.4.5-3
> >(supersedes graphics/p5-PerlMagick)
> >
> > comms_xastir.diff:
> > graphics_inksc
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> new diff, plus a few others.
>
> graphics_ImageMagick.diff:
> - update ImageMagick to 6.4.5-3
>(supersedes graphics/p5-PerlMagick)
>
> comms_xastir.diff:
> graphics_inkscape.diff:
> multimedia_dvdauthor.diff:
> net_kismet.diff:
> www_webgui.diff:
>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 05:53:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> which tests fail?
> sparc64 has failures (with segfaults) on the DPX tests.
>
i386 fails only on FPX tests (fpx is disabled via configure), PerlMagick
fails on wmf related tests if libwmf is not installed and on filter.t test
(not
On 2007/09/18 14:56, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > To save duplication of effort, it would be really useful if people
> > submitting new or updated ports would say which architecture/s they
> > have tested. Even if it's only i386.
> >
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> To save duplication of effort, it would be really useful if people
> submitting new or updated ports would say which architecture/s they
> have tested. Even if it's only i386.
>
You are right, diffs fixed, on i386 regression fails
On 2007/09/17 23:54, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> ImageMagick and p5-PerlMagick updated to latest version,
thank you.
> Comments ?
To save duplication of effort, it would be really useful if people
submitting new or updated ports would say which architecture/s they
have tested. Even if it's only i3
