On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:09:39AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:34:50AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Hang on, the regression tests failed on sparc64, but I forgot to make a log.
> > They take a while to run on a slow machine. I will mail a log as soon as its
> > done.
>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:34:50AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hang on, the regression tests failed on sparc64, but I forgot to make a log.
> They take a while to run on a slow machine. I will mail a log as soon as its
> done.
Attached.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
==
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:35:26AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > This diff updates the Subversion port to 1.6.9.
> >
> > It also fixes the build on hppa. As reported by landry@, the port was
> > running autoconf twice which mes
- Original message -
> Great,
>
> will it be in official ports of v4.7?
The answer would be obvious if you were paying attention.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Great,
will it be in official ports of v4.7?
-pekka-
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
This diff updates the Subversion port to 1.6.9.
It also fixes the build on hppa. As reported by landry@, the port was
running autoconf twice whi
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This diff updates the Subversion port to 1.6.9.
>
> It also fixes the build on hppa. As reported by landry@, the port was
> running autoconf twice which messed up the build on hppa for some reason.
> Using CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu cause
