Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/12/30 19:05, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > +Index: tools/build/src/engine/Jambase > +--- tools/build/src/engine/Jambase.orig > tools/build/src/engine/Jambase > +@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ BOOST_BUILD_PATH.user-value = $(BOOST_BUILD_PATH) ; > + # Policy. > + if ! $(BOOST_BUILD_PATH) && $(UNIX) > + {

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-30 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sun Dec 30, 2018 at 05:32:22PM +0300, Ivan Krylov wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:02:44 +0100 > Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > package fine for me. OK? > > b2 builds my projects fine, too. One small problem I have with it is > that it requires me to pass BOOST_BUILD_PATH or BOOS

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-30 Thread Ivan Krylov
Hi Rafael, On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:02:44 +0100 Rafael Sadowski wrote: > package fine for me. OK? b2 builds my projects fine, too. One small problem I have with it is that it requires me to pass BOOST_BUILD_PATH or BOOST_ROOT environment variable. I'm suggesting the patch below that should provid

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
I agree with Stuart. We're not Debian. We don't subpackage by default. If we do, there needs to be a good reason. On December 28, 2018 8:04:51 PM GMT+01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote: >> On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
Ok with me. -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 28 December 2018 20:02:51 Rafael Sadowski wrote: On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 07:04:51PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-28 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 07:04:51PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Why subpackage this? > > > > Because nobody needs boost-build to run/build any ports. Let's be > > unfair, nobod

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Why subpackage this? > > Because nobody needs boost-build to run/build any ports. Let's be > unfair, nobody needs boost-build except *maybe* a handful user. If it was something huge

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-28 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Why subpackage this? Because nobody needs boost-build to run/build any ports. Let's be unfair, nobody needs boost-build except *maybe* a handful user. Doas another subpackge hurts? > -- > Sent from a phone, apologies for poor fo

Re: update/fix: devel/boost

2018-12-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
Why subpackage this? -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 28 December 2018 13:41:22 Rafael Sadowski wrote: Hi all! Our boost.build executables b2 and bjam are useless without the *.jam stuff. The diff below want to fix the situation withe a third sub-package named "build".