On 2018/12/30 19:05, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> +Index: tools/build/src/engine/Jambase
> +--- tools/build/src/engine/Jambase.orig
> tools/build/src/engine/Jambase
> +@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ BOOST_BUILD_PATH.user-value = $(BOOST_BUILD_PATH) ;
> + # Policy.
> + if ! $(BOOST_BUILD_PATH) && $(UNIX)
> + {
On Sun Dec 30, 2018 at 05:32:22PM +0300, Ivan Krylov wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:02:44 +0100
> Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>
> > package fine for me. OK?
>
> b2 builds my projects fine, too. One small problem I have with it is
> that it requires me to pass BOOST_BUILD_PATH or BOOS
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:02:44 +0100
Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> package fine for me. OK?
b2 builds my projects fine, too. One small problem I have with it is
that it requires me to pass BOOST_BUILD_PATH or BOOST_ROOT environment
variable. I'm suggesting the patch below that should provid
I agree with Stuart. We're not Debian. We don't subpackage by default. If we
do, there needs to be a good reason.
On December 28, 2018 8:04:51 PM GMT+01:00, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>> On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Ok with me.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 28 December 2018 20:02:51 Rafael Sadowski wrote:
On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 07:04:51PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 07:04:51PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Why subpackage this?
> >
> > Because nobody needs boost-build to run/build any ports. Let's be
> > unfair, nobod
On 2018/12/28 19:30, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Why subpackage this?
>
> Because nobody needs boost-build to run/build any ports. Let's be
> unfair, nobody needs boost-build except *maybe* a handful user.
If it was something huge
On Fri Dec 28, 2018 at 02:31:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Why subpackage this?
Because nobody needs boost-build to run/build any ports. Let's be
unfair, nobody needs boost-build except *maybe* a handful user.
Doas another subpackge hurts?
> --
> Sent from a phone, apologies for poor fo
Why subpackage this?
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 28 December 2018 13:41:22 Rafael Sadowski wrote:
Hi all!
Our boost.build executables b2 and bjam are useless without the *.jam
stuff. The diff below want to fix the situation withe a third
sub-package named "build".