On 3/07/2014 8:29 PM, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
On 2014-07-03 Thu 16:23 PM |, Ian McWilliam wrote:
OK. Samba4 contains the /usr/local/bin/samba which is the full blown Active
Directory Server.
The RC script for that (when I write it) will need checks to make sure that
smbd / nmbd / winbindd are
On 2014-07-03 Thu 14:13 PM |, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>
> Secondly is it acceptable to create a common rc script to hold common subs
> used amongst multiple rc
> script for a port, eg samba.subr that will be used by smbd and nmbd rc
> scripts?
. /usr/local/libexec/samba-control ?
On 2014-07-03 Thu 16:23 PM |, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>
> OK. Samba4 contains the /usr/local/bin/samba which is the full blown Active
> Directory Server.
> The RC script for that (when I write it) will need checks to make sure that
> smbd / nmbd / winbindd are
> not running as those daemons are no
On 2014/07/03 16:23, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> OK, in that case, common functions will be duplicated 3 times in each
> of the smbd, nmbd, winbindd rc scripts.
rc scripts shouldn't be complicated/long enough that the duplication
is a problem :)
> OK. Samba4 contains the /usr/local/bin/samba which is the full blown Active
> Directory Server.
> The RC script for that (when I write it) will need checks to make sure that
> smbd / nmbd / winbindd are
> not running as those daemons are not used in an ADS setup.
>
> The above example is to c
On Thu, Jul 3rd, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:13:46PM +1000, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Need some advice on the rc script infrastructure and the best way to
> detect running processes.
> >
> > is some like the following acceptable practic
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:13:46PM +1000, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Need some advice on the rc script infrastructure and the best way to detect
> running processes.
>
> is some like the following acceptable practice or are there some existing
> functions that will do the
> equivalent.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot said that
> > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, frantisek holop wrote:
> >
> > > also, some ports have executable pkg/*.rc file, some dont.
> > > what's the policy on that?
> >
> > What do you mean?
hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot said that
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, frantisek holop wrote:
>
> > also, some ports have executable pkg/*.rc file, some dont.
> > what's the policy on that?
>
> What do you mean?
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 267 Apr 9 2011 /usr/ports/www
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, frantisek holop wrote:
> also, some ports have executable pkg/*.rc file, some dont.
> what's the policy on that?
What do you mean?
> now on to my problem :]
> but whenever i make make update-plist after make fake, i get:
>
> ===> Updating plist for tinyproxy-1.8.3
> Sca
10 matches
Mail list logo
