Re: port for a python module question

2009-04-11 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:31:47 +0200 frantisek holop wrote: > hi there, > > i am only a sunday porter and always run into difficulties. > > to save the hassle of compiling all the dependencies of a given > port, in the past, it was always possible for me to "cheat" the > system by installing bina

Re: port for a python module question

2009-04-11 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:18:17AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 09:23:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson said that > > you need to update python.port.mk. > > my bad, i just downloaded a snapshot ports.tar.gz If you need/must to be bandwidth efective you can use cvs(1) to

Re: port for a python module question

2009-04-11 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 09:23:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson said that > you need to update python.port.mk. my bad, i just downloaded a snapshot ports.tar.gz -f -- no sense being pessimistic. it wouldn't work anyway.

Re: port for a python module question

2009-04-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/11 21:31, frantisek holop wrote: > hi there, > > i am only a sunday porter and always run into difficulties. > > to save the hassle of compiling all the dependencies of a given > port, in the past, it was always possible for me to "cheat" the > system by installing binary ports of said