Re: mariadb on aarch64 after the llvm 13 update (Re: aarch64 bulk build report)

2021-12-27 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2021 Dec 27 (Mon) at 23:32:31 +0100 (+0100), Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: :On Mon, Dec 20 2021, phess...@openbsd.org wrote: :> bulk build on arm64.ports.openbsd.org :> started on Mon Dec 20 03:38:26 MST 2021 :> finished at Mon Dec 20 22:29:47 MST 2021 :> lasted 0D18h51m :> done with kern.ver

Re: MariaDB in current - fatal error with clients "utf8 is not supported by MySQL"

2021-08-27 Thread Ted Wynnychenko
> -Original Message- > From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 2:55 PM > On 2021/08/26 13:11, Ted Wynnychenko wrote: > > > > I have no idea what may have changed, but everything was working as > expected > > until after a reboot yesterday.

Re: MariaDB in current - fatal error with clients "utf8 is not supported by MySQL"

2021-08-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/08/27 06:51, Ted Wynnychenko wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org] > > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 2:55 PM > > > > On 2021/08/26 13:11, Ted Wynnychenko wrote: > > > > > > I have no idea what may have changed, but everythin

Re: MariaDB in current - fatal error with clients "utf8 is not supported by MySQL"

2021-08-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/08/26 13:11, Ted Wynnychenko wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:stu.li...@spacehopper.org] > > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 4:05 AM > > To: ted@comcast.net > > Cc: b...@comstyle.com; ports@openbsd.org

Re: MariaDB in current - fatal error with clients "utf8 is not supported by MySQL"

2021-08-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
+cc port maintainer and move the thread to ports@; misc@ is not a good place for this On 2021-08-25, Ted Wynnychenko wrote: > Hello > > Ok, to start with, I am not sure about any of this, but, here goes: > > I don't know why this happened just now, since I last updated the system > about 3 weeks

Re: mariadb-upgrade: can't load library 'libexecinfo.so.2.0'

2021-08-11 Thread Brad Smith
On 8/11/2021 6:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: +CC maintainer On 2021/08/11 07:44, m...@fn.de wrote: Forgot to say I'm running 6.9-stable. After installing the libexecinfo port mysqld_upgrade works. On 2021-08-11 06:56, Matthias Pressfreund wrote: After upgrading mariadb-server, I usually ru

Re: mariadb-upgrade: can't load library 'libexecinfo.so.2.0'

2021-08-11 Thread Matthias Pressfreund
Exactly. On 2021-08-11 12:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Looks like you've built this yourself on a machine with libexecinfo > installed and moved the package to another machine without it, > and the reworking of MariaDB's cmake checks has stopped the "force > disabling libexecinfo if it is inst

Re: mariadb-upgrade: can't load library 'libexecinfo.so.2.0'

2021-08-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
+CC maintainer On 2021/08/11 07:44, m...@fn.de wrote: > Forgot to say I'm running 6.9-stable. > > After installing the libexecinfo port mysqld_upgrade works. > > > On 2021-08-11 06:56, Matthias Pressfreund wrote: > > After upgrading mariadb-server, I usually run mariadb-upgrade. > > This time,

Re: mariadb-upgrade: can't load library 'libexecinfo.so.2.0'

2021-08-10 Thread mpfr
Forgot to say I'm running 6.9-stable. After installing the libexecinfo port mysqld_upgrade works. On 2021-08-11 06:56, Matthias Pressfreund wrote: > After upgrading mariadb-server, I usually run mariadb-upgrade. > This time, after upgrading to mariadb-server-10.5.12v1, I got > this: > > # maria

Re: mariadb

2019-06-13 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Jun 14 2019, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/06/14 00:30, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > CVSROOT: /cvs >> > Module name: ports >> > Changes by:st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2019/06/13 15:51:46 >> > >> > Modified files: >> >

Re: mariadb

2019-06-13 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > The client library now requires atomics. The next release has switched > to building > the codebase as C++11. The intent being to switch the various homegrown > implementations > using atomics over to using C++11 atomics. > > The whole reason the relevant b

Re: mariadb

2019-06-13 Thread Brad Smith
On 6/13/2019 7:32 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2019/06/14 00:30, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Stuart Henderson wrote: CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:ports Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2019/06/13 15:51:46 Modified files: databases/mariadb: Ma

Re: mariadb

2019-06-13 Thread Brad Smith
The client library now requires atomics. The next release has switched to building the codebase as C++11. The intent being to switch the various homegrown implementations using atomics over to using C++11 atomics. The whole reason the relevant bits were added was for atomics vs no atomics. Now

Re: mariadb

2019-06-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/06/14 00:30, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > CVSROOT:/cvs > > Module name:ports > > Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2019/06/13 15:51:46 > > > > Modified files: > > databases/mariadb: Makefile > > > > Log message: > > s

Re: mariadb, encrypt() does not work

2016-05-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/05/05 04:16, mike-...@ya.ru wrote: > Seems it happens after this change: > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/crypt/crypt.c.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.27 Yes. https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/encrypt/: > Encrypts str using the Unix crypt() system call (sic: it's actually a lib

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-12 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 02/11/16 23:48, Stuart Henderson wrote: [...] > I chose bind-address for two reasons. > > 1) it looks like Debian used to have skip-networking and changed it: > # Instead of skip-networking the default is now to listen only on > # localhost which is more compatible and is not less secure. > >

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-12 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:48:33PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/02/11 16:46, David Hill wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:21:40PM -0800, Bryce Chidester wrote: > > > What about shipping with skip-networking instead? I use this on all (just > > > 2 > > > - I'm a Postgres guy now) of

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-11 Thread David Hill
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:48:33PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/02/11 16:46, David Hill wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:21:40PM -0800, Bryce Chidester wrote: > > > What about shipping with skip-networking instead? I use this on all (just > > > 2 > > > - I'm a Postgres guy now) of

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/02/11 16:46, David Hill wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:21:40PM -0800, Bryce Chidester wrote: > > What about shipping with skip-networking instead? I use this on all (just 2 > > - I'm a Postgres guy now) of my installs without issue. As memory serves, > > libmysqlclient defaults to tryi

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-11 Thread David Hill
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:21:40PM -0800, Bryce Chidester wrote: > What about shipping with skip-networking instead? I use this on all (just 2 > - I'm a Postgres guy now) of my installs without issue. As memory serves, > libmysqlclient defaults to trying the socket first when connecting to > "local

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-11 Thread Bryce Chidester
What about shipping with skip-networking instead? I use this on all (just 2 - I'm a Postgres guy now) of my installs without issue. As memory serves, libmysqlclient defaults to trying the socket first when connecting to "localhost." Furthermore, this ensures that it's never accidentally made public

Re: MariaDB default IP address binding

2016-02-11 Thread Giovanni Bechis
Il 11 febbraio 2016 21:20:04 CET, Stuart Henderson ha scritto: >I was just installing MariaDB on a new machine and ran into this again >that I hit in 2014.. > >- Forwarded message from Stuart Henderson - > >Hmm, looks like default config is to bind to :: (v6 only) and it >inherits old my

Re: mariadb

2013-11-23 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:36:36PM -0600, joshua stein wrote: > Now that MariaDB builds on non-x86 platforms by disabling its > non-blocking API[0], can we re-enable it in databases/Makefile to > start building packages for it? > > I think it still needs more testing[1] before we completely replac

Re: Mariadb is i386/amd64 only ?

2013-06-12 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:04:31PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > I filed a bug report upstream.. > > > > https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4601 > > > > The lack of ucontext support has come up before in other projects > > like PowerDNS and Matthew also mentioned libunwind; it was also an >

Re: MariaDB

2013-06-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/06/09 13:16, Brian Callahan wrote: > On 6/9/2013 1:13 PM, Kayo Hamid wrote: > >Have someone working on MariaDB port? Because I want to do that. > > > > Already ported... > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases/mariadb/ It is, and we have switched across to it in ports, but

Re: MariaDB

2013-06-09 Thread Kayo Hamid
> > > Already ported... > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-**bin/cvsweb/ports/databases/**mariadb/ Very nice. > If you want to help update, great. But simply saying "it broke" isn't > helping. > > ~Brian > Yes and I'll give something be

Re: MariaDB

2013-06-09 Thread Brian Callahan
On 6/9/2013 1:13 PM, Kayo Hamid wrote: Have someone working on MariaDB port? Because I want to do that. Already ported... http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases/mariadb/ What I have done so far is compile MariaDB 5.5.31 without major problems, but 10.0.2 version broke. If y

Re: Mariadb is i386/amd64 only ?

2013-06-01 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:25:06PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > On 01/06/13 3:23 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >argh. (or, "that should speed up bulk builds!") > > > >http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.5-release/revision/2502.531.1 > > > >As they specifically mention lua coco (coco.l

Re: Mariadb is i386/amd64 only ?

2013-06-01 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 14:25, Brad Smith wrote: > The lack of ucontext support has come up before in other projects like > PowerDNS and Matthew also mentioned libunwind; it was also an issue with > QEMU for awhile. It was part of POSIX and has been removed. So what do > we do being the odd man ou

Re: Mariadb is i386/amd64 only ?

2013-06-01 Thread Brad Smith
On 01/06/13 3:23 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: argh. (or, "that should speed up bulk builds!") http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.5-release/revision/2502.531.1 As they specifically mention lua coco (coco.luajit.org) maybe it's similar enough that coco's setjmp-based code could

Re: Mariadb is i386/amd64 only ?

2013-06-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
argh. (or, "that should speed up bulk builds!") http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.5-release/revision/2502.531.1 As they specifically mention lua coco (coco.luajit.org) maybe it's similar enough that coco's setjmp-based code could be borrowed... Landry Breuil wrote: >On Fri,