On 2011-11-22, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> However, somehow the binaries distributed with the 5.0 release and
> recent snapshots still aren't getting linked with the right library.
Sure, but this is a problem with the R port, not anything else.
Fixing it anywhere else is wrong (in particular what y
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:12:16AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> On 11/21/11 23:04, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> >>The problem is that the shared object library
> >>
> >>/usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2800.0
> >>or
> >>/usr/local/
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:12:16AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> On 11/21/11 23:04, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> >>The problem is that the shared object library
> >>
> >>/usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2800.0
> >>or
> >>/usr/local/
On 11/21/11 23:04, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
The problem is that the shared object library
/usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2800.0
or
/usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2992.0
as it is by now in -CURRENT
tries to execute function cal
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:37:42 -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> ld: unrecognized option '-pthread'
> ld: use the --help option for usage information
Use gcc(1) instead of calling ld directly.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> The problem is that the shared object library
>
> /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2800.0
> or
> /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.2992.0
> as it is by now in -CURRENT
>
> tries to execute function calls that are implemented in
>
On 11/21/11 18:11, Justin Lindberg wrote:
On 11/21/11 17:37, Justin Lindberg wrote:
On 11/21/11 04:46, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:31:12AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
OpenBSD 5.0 amd64 -- probably all a
On 11/21/11 17:37, Justin Lindberg wrote:
On 11/21/11 04:46, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:31:12AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
OpenBSD 5.0 amd64 -- probably all arches
Still not fixed in current.
I tried
On 11/21/11 04:46, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:31:12AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
OpenBSD 5.0 amd64 -- probably all arches
Still not fixed in current.
I tried to run R, and libgthread-2.0 segfaulted
bec
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:31:12AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> > OpenBSD 5.0 amd64 -- probably all arches
> > Still not fixed in current.
> >
> > I tried to run R, and libgthread-2.0 segfaulted
> > because apparently it was no
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:31:12AM -0800, Justin Lindberg wrote:
> OpenBSD 5.0 amd64 -- probably all arches
> Still not fixed in current.
>
> I tried to run R, and libgthread-2.0 segfaulted
> because apparently it was not linked with pthread.
>
> I confirmed this, because relinking the shared
> l
11 matches
Mail list logo
