On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:58 PM, David Coppa wrote:
> Just noticed this while looking at another thing (math/R):
>
> configure:35621: checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran compiler
> configure:35634: gfortran -c conftest.F >&5
> gfortran: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file
> > sure, 4.2.1 port attached (hardly changed wrt 4.2.4 port).
> > only built blas/cblas with it, and that also works.
>
> tested with gfortran 4.2.1 the ports which have fortran in MODULES.
> this is on amd64. now we should compare regress to building with g77.
I reworked the port some more, to
Steven Mestdagh [2010-06-14, 20:22:02]:
> sure, 4.2.1 port attached (hardly changed wrt 4.2.4 port).
> only built blas/cblas with it, and that also works.
tested with gfortran 4.2.1 the ports which have fortran in MODULES.
this is on amd64. now we should compare regress to building with g77.
Marc Espie [2010-06-14, 09:36:44]:
> One change that would be needed is to move back to 4.2.1, so that it synchs
> with base.
>
> Otherwise, it's going to be a nightmare to keep it working on all arches
> that are in base, and that have umpteen patches...
sure, 4.2.1 port attached (hardly changed
Landry Breuil [2010-06-14, 09:22:41]:
> > > > this is a standalone port of gfortran, to be used on archs which have
> > > > gcc4
> > > > in base. this port is based on the gcc/4.2 port.
> > > >
> > > > gfortran compiles both fortran 77 and fortran 95 code.
> > > >
> > > > tested ok on amd64. if
One change that would be needed is to move back to 4.2.1, so that it synchs
with base.
Otherwise, it's going to be a nightmare to keep it working on all arches
that are in base, and that have umpteen patches...
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:32:33PM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> Landry Breuil [2010-06-13, 13:08:56]:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:24:09AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > this is a standalone port of gfortran, to be used on archs which have gcc4
> > > in base. this port is
Landry Breuil [2010-06-13, 13:08:56]:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:24:09AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > this is a standalone port of gfortran, to be used on archs which have gcc4
> > in base. this port is based on the gcc/4.2 port.
> >
> > gfortran compiles both fortran 77 and fo
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:24:09AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> hi,
>
> this is a standalone port of gfortran, to be used on archs which have gcc4
> in base. this port is based on the gcc/4.2 port.
>
> gfortran compiles both fortran 77 and fortran 95 code.
>
> tested ok on amd64. if someone c
