On Thu, Apr 05 2018, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Mar 18 21:00:19, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
>> On 2018/03/18 17:08, Jan Stary wrote:
>> > audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination.
>> > The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer)
>> > - do other pjsua users actually u
On Mar 18 21:00:19, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> On 2018/03/18 17:08, Jan Stary wrote:
> > audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination.
> > The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer)
> > - do other pjsua users actually use AMR? I have never seen it used.
> >
> > I
On 2018/03/18 17:08, Jan Stary wrote:
> audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination.
> The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer)
> - do other pjsua users actually use AMR? I have never seen it used.
>
> If we drop opencore-amr from pjsua (pending), we can drop ope
On Mar 18 17:08:44, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> audio/opencore-amr is no longer used by sox or imagination.
> The only remaining use is by telephony/pjsua (no maintainer)
Here are the other ports mentioning AMR, but not using opencore-amr
- either explicitly disabling it, or using another implmentation
On Mar 17 16:15:36, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> done sox/imagination.
Thanks.
> it might still be useful for pjsua though
> so i'd be inclined to keep that.
My real goal is to drop opencore-amr altogether,
these are the individual steps to not use it.
pjsua has no maintainer - do pjsua users
Ping
On 17 Mar 2018 3:32 pm, "Jan Stary" wrote:
> ping
>
> On Jan 28 09:08:24, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > ping
> >
> > On Nov 01 14:49:04, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > ping
> > >
> > > On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > > Below is a diff
ping
On Jan 28 09:08:24, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> ping
>
> On Nov 01 14:49:04, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > ping
> >
> > On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile
> > > > and removes the
ping
On Nov 01 14:49:04, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> ping
>
> On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile
> > > and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination,
> > > and tel
ping
On Sep 20 15:13:33, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile
> > and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination,
> > and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something.
>
On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile
> and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination,
> and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something.
On Sep 20 13:11:38, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> multime
Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile
and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination,
and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something.
(The current multimedia/imagination mentions opencore-amr in WANTLIB
but not in LIB_DEPENDS - is that ri
On 2017/09/20 11:21, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Sep 20 12:09:25, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > Grep'ing /usr/ports for 'opencore', these seem to be affected:
> >
> > * audio/opencore-amr (obviously)
> > * audio/sox (handled below)
> > * multimedia/imagination (cc maintainer)
> > * telephony/pjsua (no ma
On Sep 20 12:09:25, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> Grep'ing /usr/ports for 'opencore', these seem to be affected:
>
> * audio/opencore-amr (obviously)
> * audio/sox (handled below)
> * multimedia/imagination (cc maintainer)
> * telephony/pjsua (no maintainer)
>
> These seem to _not_ be affected:
>
>
On Sep 15 08:36:42, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> On 2017/09/15 07:56, Jan Stary wrote:
> > A new version of opencore-amr is out since January.
> > Before I upgrade the port, shouldn't we rather drop it?
> >
> > Originaly, I added the opencore-amr port to have AMR in SoX,
> > because AMR is what A
On 2017/09/15 07:56, Jan Stary wrote:
> A new version of opencore-amr is out since January.
> Before I upgrade the port, shouldn't we rather drop it?
>
> Originaly, I added the opencore-amr port to have AMR in SoX,
> because AMR is what Android recorded by default in its voice recorder.
> That's n
15 matches
Mail list logo
