On 2023/02/08 11:26, Marc Espie wrote:
> This proved surprisingly complicated.
> This should fix fetching for
> BUILD_DEPENDS = some/path:patch
> situations (where the path actually doesn't get built)
>
> This could use a full bulk or two.
>
> (I expect to simplify the "new_path/new_fetch_path co
Marc Espie:
> This should fix fetching for
> BUILD_DEPENDS = some/path:patch
> situations (where the path actually doesn't get built)
>
> This could use a full bulk or two.
It didn't break anything in an amd64 bulk build.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka