Patch for 0.95.1 which was commited to the tree recently.
freshclam works, but that's not a real test. Please test, I'm not in a
position to do that now. TIA.
--
best regards
q#
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/clam
updated for 0.95.1.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/clamav/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -N -u -p Makefile
--- Makefile13 Dec 2008 10:19:09 - 1.41
+++ Makefile10 Apr 2009 15:37:13 -
@@
On 2009/04/08 21:47, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:48:53PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > here's an evil update to 0.95. (note the nasty LIBTOOL= line...)
>
> Doesn't work with our in tree libtool?
they include their own libltdl.
if you use the usual ports libtool, it
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:48:53PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> here's an evil update to 0.95. (note the nasty LIBTOOL= line...)
Doesn't work with our in tree libtool?
> @@ -31,9 +30,9 @@ RUN_DEPENDS=:lha-*:archivers/lha \
> :unzip-*:archivers/unzip
>
On 2009/04/08 12:37, b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu wrote:
> http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.4-stable/diffs/security,clamav-0.94.2p0.diff
>
> Sent to mbalmer@ earlier, but I suspect he's working on a proper update
> to 0.95.
>
> This fixes the security issue by applying the patch found here:
>
> https://
