On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:53:11AM +0200, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
> * Matt Van Mater [2005-09-21]:
> > be nice to have a notice during verbose installation that notifies the
> > user of any dependencies that are not allowed on the FTP and/or CD.
>
> That doesn't make sense, just because a package is
Thank you. Guess I should have researched it further. I didn't
'cause it was only a minor inconvenience.
-ME
On 9/22/05, Jolan Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Michael Erdely wrote:
> > On 9/22/05, David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Michael Erdely wrote:
> On 9/22/05, David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> > > >pkg_add will sooner or later try to find a ports tree and build missing
> > > >packages.
> > >
>
> I'd a
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Michael Erdely wrote:
>On 9/22/05, David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Matt Van Mater wrote:
>> > >pkg_add will sooner or later try to find a ports tree and build missing
>> > >packages.
>I'd also l
On 9/22/05, David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> > >pkg_add will sooner or later try to find a ports tree and build missing
> > >packages.
> >
I'd also like to suggest the opposite:
building a port tries to pkg_add any prerequ
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> >pkg_add will sooner or later try to find a ports tree and build missing
> >packages.
>
> This is a great idea. If the ports tree is found, you could parse the
> makefile of the package that you're trying to install and grab the
>
>pkg_add will sooner or later try to find a ports tree and build missing
>packages.
This is a great idea. If the ports tree is found, you could parse the
makefile of the package that you're trying to install and grab the
relative path of each dependency, and in turn search their makefiles
to see
* Matt Van Mater [2005-09-21]:
> I understand what is required to make this work and that it is quite
> easy to do. However I think this isn't the right way to manage and
> distribute packages.
pkg_add will sooner or later try to find a ports tree and build missing
packages.
> I imagine that es
> I've run into this with several packages. Just install the package,
> when it fails on a dependency, build that port, install it and then
> re-install the original package. It's not too difficult.
>
I understand what is required to make this work and that it is quite
easy to do. However I thi
> It's a licensing issue. arc is in ports, but it's not allowed to be
> on the FTP server.
>
> Download, extract the ports tree and build arc.
>
> -ME
OK, that sounds reasonable. However I think publishing the clamav
package without its dependencies significantly reduces its usefulness
as a pack
I've run into this with several packages. Just install the package,
when it fails on a dependency, build that port, install it and then
re-install the original package. It's not too difficult.
-ME
On 9/21/05, Matt Van Mater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's a licensing issue. arc is in ports
It's a licensing issue. arc is in ports, but it's not allowed to be
on the FTP server.
Download, extract the ports tree and build arc.
-ME
On 9/21/05, Matt Van Mater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was trying to install the OpenBSD 3.7 clamav package from a ftp
> mirror site, but it looks like o
12 matches
Mail list logo
