On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 18:47:12 +, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> > > The upgrade must be done *before* upgrading. If a user already ran
> > > `pkg_add -u`, it will be a pain to reinstall the old minio version
> > > (libs bump and co)... unless we provide both version in the ports
> > > tree. So, shou
On 2024/01/17 18:59, Peter Hessler wrote:
> Earlier in the thread there was the possibility of adding the in-tree
> version of minio as an older version, then adding in a newer version
> that'll receive updates. Can we keep the old version for a long time?
Should be fine for now - it may suffer t
On 2024 Jan 17 (Wed) at 12:47:29 -0500 (-0500), Daniel Jakots wrote:
:On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:49:50 +0100, Peter Hessler
:wrote:
:
:> On 2024 Jan 06 (Sat) at 09:25:22 -0500 (-0500), Daniel Jakots wrote:
:> :On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 15:15:25 +0100, Peter Hessler
:> :wrote:
:> :
:> :> annoyingly this chan
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:49:50 +0100, Peter Hessler
wrote:
> On 2024 Jan 06 (Sat) at 09:25:22 -0500 (-0500), Daniel Jakots wrote:
> :On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 15:15:25 +0100, Peter Hessler
> :wrote:
> :
> :> annoyingly this change completely fucks me over, because the
> feature :> they are removing is 10
Mmh, fun fact - I just upgraded my two replicated nodes and everything
works as expected - two nodes with each one having a single drive...
On 06 Jan 09:25, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 15:15:25 +0100, Peter Hessler
> wrote:
>
> > annoyingly this change completely fucks me over, bec
On 2024 Jan 06 (Sat) at 09:25:22 -0500 (-0500), Daniel Jakots wrote:
:On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 15:15:25 +0100, Peter Hessler
:wrote:
:
:> annoyingly this change completely fucks me over, because the feature
:> they are removing is 100% the reason I'm using it.
:
:I'm not sure I understand. What is the f
> > The upgrade must be done *before* upgrading. If a user already ran
> > `pkg_add -u`, it will be a pain to reinstall the old minio version
> > (libs bump and co)... unless we provide both version in the ports
> > tree. So, should we do this?
It seems a good idea to provide both.
> > /usr/ports
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 15:15:25 +0100, Peter Hessler
wrote:
> annoyingly this change completely fucks me over, because the feature
> they are removing is 100% the reason I'm using it.
I'm not sure I understand. What is the feature you're mentioning?
What would you miss if you switched to the Single
annoyingly this change completely fucks me over, because the feature
they are removing is 100% the reason I'm using it.
are there any s3 compatible tools that still use a filesystem for the
backend?
On 2023 Dec 22 (Fri) at 20:43:05 -0500 (-0500), Daniel Jakots wrote:
:Hey,
:
:Here's a diff to up
ping
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 20:43:05 -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Here's a diff to update to minio-0.20231214. The reason I stopped
> upgrading is because:
>
> > The MinIO Gateway and the related filesystem mode entered a feature
> > freeze in July 2020. In February 2022, MinIO announce
10 matches
Mail list logo
