On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Clint Pachl wrote:
> Can't Sinatra be managed in the same way Jeremy proposes for Rails? I.e.,
> remove it from the OpenBSD tree and manage it via gem.
>
> I've been using gem to manage Ruby gems (sinatra, tilt, rack,
> rack-protection, erubis, etc.) directly and
Can't Sinatra be managed in the same way Jeremy proposes for Rails?
I.e., remove it from the OpenBSD tree and manage it via gem.
I've been using gem to manage Ruby gems (sinatra, tilt, rack,
rack-protection, erubis, etc.) directly and this seems to work. No need
to duplicate the efforts in the
On 12/05 01:17, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> This updates sinatra to 1.3.1, changes at
> https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/blob/master/CHANGES
>
> This depends on the rack update included with the Rails diff I recently
> sent. This also needs a new dependency, www/ruby-rack-protection,
> attached.
Thi