Yeah I think you are right. Updated just to keep the comment regarding
version sensitivity between b2sdk <-> duplicity.
README added.
On 2023-09-25 7:33 a.m., Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023/09/25 11:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I think it's intentional that duplicity doesm't force a depend
On 2023/09/25 11:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/09/24 21:49, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> > Patch to add dependency on net/py-b2sdk to support backup to
> > Backblaze B2. First class support for this platform is
> > already built into duplicity (https://duplicity.gitlab.io/).
>
> I think it's i
On 2023/09/24 21:49, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> Patch to add dependency on net/py-b2sdk to support backup to
> Backblaze B2. First class support for this platform is
> already built into duplicity (https://duplicity.gitlab.io/).
I think it's intentional that duplicity doesm't force a dependency on
s
Thank you Jason for your update, which has just been committed. Sorry
for the delay!
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
Just got back in town. Working on my mail server now. Sorry for the
trouble.
jim@
* Jason Tubnor [140825 22:26]:
> Ping?
>
> P.S. Now also tested on macppc. Maintainer email is also broken -
> maybe change back to ports@ or I'll take the maintainer status for it.
>
> Thx.
>
> -- F
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:33:21AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
[...]
>> A flavour sounds like a good idea and I'll work on that in spare time but
>> don't let it hold this up.
>
> I think a simple note in DESCR is enough.
> No need for a FLAVOR nor imposing dependencie
On Mon, September 1, 2014 01:33, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 1 September 2014 04:12, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
>> Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
>> install
>> support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
>>
>
> Ok with me. Th
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:33:21AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
> > Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
> > install
> > support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
> >
>
>
On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
> install
> support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
>
Ok with me. The backends are in and the same outcome is achieved, be it
with a
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 08:12:37PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Giovanni Bechis writes:
>
> > On 08/28/14 00:57, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> >> On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> >>> Untested so far, one nit below.
>
> [...]
>
> >>> ... the files are added here an
Giovanni Bechis writes:
> On 08/28/14 00:57, Jason Tubnor wrote:
>> On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>>> Untested so far, one nit below.
[...]
>>> ... the files are added here anyway. The CHANGELOG says that it was
>>> fixed in this release, so it probably makes sense
On 08/28/14 00:57, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
>>
>> Untested so far, one nit below.
>>
>> Index: pkg/PLIST
>> ===
>> RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/sysutils/duplicity/pkg/PLIST,v
>> ret
On 27 August 2014 21:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Untested so far, one nit below.
>
> Index: pkg/PLIST
> ===
> RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/sysutils/duplicity/pkg/PLIST,v
> retrieving revision 1.13
> diff -u -p -r1.13 PLIST
>
(Adding Jim to the Cc: list.)
Giovanni Bechis writes:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:26:14PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> On 08/26/14 12:43, Jason Tubnor wrote:
>> > On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> >
>> >> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintain
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:26:14PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 08/26/14 12:43, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> > On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >
> >> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
> >> or do you prefer to set ports@ as maintainer ?
> >
On 08/26/14 12:43, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>
>> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
>> or do you prefer to set ports@ as maintainer ?
>
> Thanks Giovanni. I'll take the maintainership on. Jason Tubnor
>
>
> Ch
On 26 August 2014 16:33, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
> or do you prefer to set ports@ as maintainer ?
Thanks Giovanni. I'll take the maintainership on. Jason Tubnor
Cheers,
Jason
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:25:38PM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> Ping?
>
> P.S. Now also tested on macppc. Maintainer email is also broken -
> maybe change back to ports@ or I'll take the maintainer status for it.
>
I will commit it in a couple of days, do you want to take maintainership
or do y
Ping?
P.S. Now also tested on macppc. Maintainer email is also broken -
maybe change back to ports@ or I'll take the maintainer status for it.
Thx.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Tubnor
Date: 19 August 2014 12:49
Subject: Update: sysutils/duplicity
To: ports@openbsd.org,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:35:27PM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> * Stefan Sperling [100921 15:31]:
> > Light testing suggests that it works.
> >
> > ok?
> >
>
> Does MASTER_SITES need to be updated similar to my older patch?
> http://bitbucket.org/bonetruck/my-ports-wip/src/tip/sysutils_duplicity
* Stefan Sperling [100921 15:31]:
> Light testing suggests that it works.
>
> ok?
>
Does MASTER_SITES need to be updated similar to my older patch?
http://bitbucket.org/bonetruck/my-ports-wip/src/tip/sysutils_duplicity
Can you confirm what destination(s) you've backed up to and restored
from?
21 matches
Mail list logo
