Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-12-06 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > is this OK now, or still rough things left that should be cleaned? ok naddy@ If you want to tweak the port further (maybe after committing the update), you could try to find out how to disable building the profiled libraries. These aren't used, so all libraries ar

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-12-06 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, On Thursday, December 1, 2011 14:27 CET, "Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 22:42 CET, "Sebastian Reitenbach" > wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 21:59 CET, na...@mips.inka.de wrote: > > > > > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > >

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-12-01 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 22:42 CET, "Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 21:59 CET, na...@mips.inka.de wrote: > > > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > > > > don't think there's much of a point. You aren't unhiding any > > > > > > I did not made

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-30 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 21:59 CET, na...@mips.inka.de wrote: > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > > don't think there's much of a point. You aren't unhiding any > > > > I did not made a patch, since in the end, it would have been a huge patch. > > Really? It affects a total of

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-30 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > don't think there's much of a point. You aren't unhiding any > > I did not made a patch, since in the end, it would have been a huge patch. Really? It affects a total of ten lines spread over three files. Anyway, I suggest to just drop the whole thing. Now t

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-30 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, I tried to address all of your concerns, see below, and attached patch. On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 16:14 CET, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Pascal Stumpf: > > > Here's an updated diff. > > I tried to build this on my alpha, which actually has an old SCSI > CD burner. > > * cdda2

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-30 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Christian Weisgerber wrote: > * cdda2wav wasn't built at all. > (I'll look into the details later...) Patching cdda2wav/local.cnf.in triggers an attempt to run the included mutant autoconf in order to regenerate the cdda2wav configure script. This fails if GNU m4 isn't installed, causing the

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-30 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Pascal Stumpf: > Here's an updated diff. I tried to build this on my alpha, which actually has an old SCSI CD burner. * cdda2wav wasn't built at all. (I'll look into the details later...) * Some parts (libedc, libmdigest) are built with "-O3 -fexpensive-optimizations". I think we should ki

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-29 Thread Pascal Stumpf
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:01:53 + (UTC), Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > attached patch updates cdrtools to 3.00. Patch is mostly based on > > pascal@ work, with some minor tweaks by me. > > That patch reverts my Nov 1 changes to the port and subsequent > commits

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools

2011-11-29 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > attached patch updates cdrtools to 3.00. Patch is mostly based on > pascal@ work, with some minor tweaks by me. That patch reverts my Nov 1 changes to the port and subsequent commits. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/cdrtools-3.0

2011-10-26 Thread Pascal Stumpf
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:49:42 +0200, "Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote: > Hi, > > for a port I'm working on, it relies on cdrecord -minfo parameter, which does > n't exist in cdrtools-2.01. > The build system is still weird, therefore I kept this do-install thingie, bu > t got rid of some patches. > >