Gleydson Soares wrote:
> > Regarding setting NO_TEST, bsd.port.mk(5) says it should be set to Yes
> > "only for ports with no regression test", so I'm not sure if using Yes
> > here would be an abuse.
>
> yes, right.
> maybe we should add a comment showing that failure is kwown.
Sure, no proble
> Deployed this on my server and I don't see any issue so far. In fact,
> prosody is communicating over TLS without problems, so I'd it's OK
> from prosody side.
thanks for testing, i have just committed the luasec update.
> Regarding setting NO_TEST, bsd.port.mk(5) says it should be set to Yes
>
Hi Gleydson,
thanks for reaching out.
> the following diff updates luasec to 0.9.
>
> the only consumer of luasec on ports is net/prosody
Deployed this on my server and I don't see any issue so far. In fact,
prosody is communicating over TLS without problems, so I'd it's OK
from prosody side.
