Re: update py-sphinx to v4.0.2

2021-07-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/07/06 02:21, Daniel Dickman wrote: > Here's an update of py-sphinx to v4.0.2: > - v4.0.1 doesn't work great because it moves some man pages around > - v4.0.2 reverts the man page change, but updates one of the .js files > requiring about 20+ consumer ports to have PLISTs updated > - v4.0

Re: update py-sphinx to v4.0.2

2021-07-06 Thread Greg Steuck
Thank for the careful update! Daniel Dickman writes: > Here's an update of py-sphinx to v4.0.2: > - v4.0.1 doesn't work great because it moves some man pages around > - v4.0.2 reverts the man page change, but updates one of the .js files > requiring about 20+ consumer ports to have PLISTs upd

Re: UPDATE: py-sphinx

2014-09-19 Thread frantisek holop
Stuart Henderson, 19 Sep 2014 12:49: > There are 20-odd ports using it and it does have a history of changing > the generated files between releases, even if it's not fully tested I would > definitely want to know that it doesn't break cmake and llvm before it's > committed.. here is the result of

Re: UPDATE: py-sphinx

2014-09-19 Thread frantisek holop
Stuart Henderson, 19 Sep 2014 12:49: > On 2014/09/18 17:06, frantisek holop wrote: > > ping? > > > > i have built html docs for py-django > > with both 1.1.3 and 1.2.3 and the PLIST > > did not change. > > Hmm, it isn't even listed as a dep for py-django? it is in the update :) (and have been in

Re: UPDATE: py-sphinx

2014-09-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/09/18 17:06, frantisek holop wrote: > ping? > > i have built html docs for py-django > with both 1.1.3 and 1.2.3 and the PLIST > did not change. Hmm, it isn't even listed as a dep for py-django? There are 20-odd ports using it and it does have a history of changing the generated files be

Re: UPDATE: py-sphinx

2014-09-18 Thread frantisek holop
ping? i have built html docs for py-django with both 1.1.3 and 1.2.3 and the PLIST did not change. -f frantisek holop, 05 Sep 2014 15:01: > this is an update to sphinx 1.2.3 > > i have run all the tests except > the pdflatex ones. can somebody test that please? > (it is in the port makefile)

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-09 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:15:18PM +, Stuart Henderson said that > On 2014/02/08 08:00, frantisek holop wrote: > > but of course, i like to have tests (and pass them). > > > > having said that: > > - i am not going to install texmf > > > > - i dont mind keeping the dependency there, > >

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/02/08 08:00, frantisek holop wrote: > but of course, i like to have tests (and pass them). > > having said that: > - i am not going to install texmf > > - i dont mind keeping the dependency there, > but someone else will have to raise the issue > if latex tests are failing. what do the t

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-07 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:08:24AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado said that > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:07:51AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > > hmm, on Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 11:05:51PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero > > Hurtado said that > > > The latex support in sphinx is important

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-03 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:07:51AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 11:05:51PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > said that > > The latex support in sphinx is important, so remove texmf from test deps > > is not a good idea. frantisek, I know texmf is really big bu

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-03 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 11:05:51PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado said that > The latex support in sphinx is important, so remove texmf from test deps > is not a good idea. frantisek, I know texmf is really big but you only > need download the distfile one time per year. this is not a

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-03 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:08:24PM +, Stuart Henderson said that > dependencies need checking to make sure that this doesn't change the > generated files, as has happened in the past with some (but not all) deps > after a previous py-sphinx update - realistically I think this should > wait

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-02 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:08:24PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014/02/02 10:02, frantisek holop wrote: > > hmm, on Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:39:42AM -0800, Martynas Venckus said that > > > On 1/31/14, frantisek holop wrote: > > > > happy chinese new year of the horse, > > > > > > > > here i

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/02/02 10:02, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:39:42AM -0800, Martynas Venckus said that > > On 1/31/14, frantisek holop wrote: > > > happy chinese new year of the horse, > > > > > > here is a simplish update for sphinx. > > > i thought i'd try to give a hand to the

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-02 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:39:42AM -0800, Martynas Venckus said that > On 1/31/14, frantisek holop wrote: > > happy chinese new year of the horse, > > > > here is a simplish update for sphinx. > > i thought i'd try to give a hand to the MAINTAINER :) > > Thanks, however I don't use py-sphinx

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-01-31 Thread Martynas Venckus
On 1/31/14, frantisek holop wrote: > happy chinese new year of the horse, > > here is a simplish update for sphinx. > i thought i'd try to give a hand to the MAINTAINER :) Thanks, however I don't use py-sphinx anymore. Could you remove me from MAINTAINER -- and maybe you're interested in taking