On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 09:57:11PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> There was one build error (x11/xcolor), but it's not clear that it
> was caused by the Python update. I sent details to Remi and Laurence.
A quick update of the off-list discussion: I believe this was caused because
of a mis
Remi Pointel:
> this is the diff to update Python 3.8 to latest release.
>
> sthen@ or naddy@: someone of you could test a bulk build with this diff?
There was one build error (x11/xcolor), but it's not clear that it
was caused by the Python update. I sent details to Remi and Laurence.
--
Chr
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:15:48AM +, wen heping wrote:
> Hi, ports@:
>Here is a patch to update lang/python/3.8 to 3.8.5,
> it include at least 4 security fix:
>https://docs.python.org/release/3.8.5/whatsnew/changelog.html#changelog
> It build well and run well on amd64-current sys
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:58:48PM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
> this is the diff to update Python 3.8 to latest relase.
> Ok?
ok kmos
--Kurt
> Diff from regression tests:
> $ diff -u /tmp/Python-3.8.1 /tmp/Python-3.8.2
>
> --- /tmp/Python-3.8.1
> +++ /tmp/Python-3.8.2
> @@ -1,13 +1,14 @
Remi Pointel:
> this diff updates python 3.7 to latest release 3.7.4.
> Could you test it in a bulk build please?
There were no problems on amd64.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On 2019/04/02 10:15, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:31:57AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > So it turns out there is rather more to this release than is obvious
> > from the "full changelog" linked from
> > https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-2716/ ... The main p
So it turns out there is rather more to this release than is obvious from
the "full changelog" linked from
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-2716/ ... The main part is
at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/python/cpython/v2.7.16/Misc/NEWS.d/2.7.16rc1.rst
This is both more intrusi
Remi Pointel:
> this is the diff to update Python 3.6 to latest release.
> @naddy: could you test it in a bulk build please? Thanks in advance.
Done. No problems from this.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Christian Weisgerber:
> > attached is the diff to update to python 3.6.7.
> > Please test this diff in a bulk build.
>
> I have started an amd64 bulk build with this.
Finished. No problems.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Remi Pointel:
> attached is the diff to update to python 3.6.7.
> Please test this diff in a bulk build.
I have started an amd64 bulk build with this.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Christian Weisgerber:
> > attached is the diff to update Python to latest release.
> > Could someone please run a bulk build with this diff please?
>
> Will do.
It finished without problems.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Remi Pointel:
> attached is the diff to update Python to latest release.
> Could someone please run a bulk build with this diff please?
Will do.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Remi Pointel:
> this is the diff to update Python 3.6 to latest release.
> Could it be tested in a bulk build please?
No problems in a full amd64 build.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Christian Weisgerber:
> > this is the diff to update Python to latest release 3.6.4.
> > Could someone please run a bulk build with this diff please?
>
> I have started an amd64 bulk build with this.
Which finished without problems.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na..
Remi Pointel:
> this is the diff to update Python to latest release 3.6.4.
>
> Could someone please run a bulk build with this diff please?
I have started an amd64 bulk build with this.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Remi Pointel:
> this is the diff to update Python 2.7 to latest release: 2.7.14.
>
> Could it be tested in a bulk build please?
There were no problems on amd64.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On 2017/08/06 07:45, Remi Pointel wrote:
> On 07/25/17 07:53, Remi Pointel wrote:
> > On 07/17/17 22:07, Remi Pointel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this is the diff to update Python 3.6 to latest release (3.6.2).
> > >
> > > Could this diff be tested in a bulk please?
> >
> > ping.
> >
> > Thank
On 07/25/17 07:53, Remi Pointel wrote:
On 07/17/17 22:07, Remi Pointel wrote:
Hi,
this is the diff to update Python 3.6 to latest release (3.6.2).
Could this diff be tested in a bulk please?
ping.
Thanks,
Remi.
ping.
Remi.
On 07/17/17 22:07, Remi Pointel wrote:
Hi,
this is the diff to update Python 3.6 to latest release (3.6.2).
Could this diff be tested in a bulk please?
ping.
Thanks,
Remi.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 08:08:54AM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
> On 12/22/15 07:13, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:34:19PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>this is the diff to update Python 3.5 to latest version.
> >>
> >>Ok?
> >>
> >
> >ok shadchin@
>
> Hi,
>
>
On 12/22/15 07:13, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:34:19PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
Hi,
this is the diff to update Python 3.5 to latest version.
Ok?
ok shadchin@
Hi,
sorry my diff was not ok. Files was added in pkg/PLIST-tests because I
run make test before, there
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:34:19PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update Python 3.5 to latest version.
>
> Ok?
>
ok shadchin@
> Cheers,
>
> Remi.
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/pyth
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update Python to 2.7.8.
>
> Thanks to daniel@ who added patches for regress tests on 2.7.7.
>
> Are you ok?
works for me on i386. also tested with numpy 1.8.1 and a few local
scripts which all work fine.
so ok dan
hrmm, test_threading failure is known. the other might be related to the
kqueue change.
can I have the log please?
f.-
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/11/15 11:27, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> > It'd be nice to have a test on a 32bit arch at least. i386, anyone
Yes, one for normal (.py) files and once for optimized (.pyo) IIRC.
f.-
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/11/15 14:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/11/15 11:27, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> > > It'd be nice to have a test on a 32bit arch at least. i386, an
On 2013/11/15 14:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/11/15 11:27, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> > It'd be nice to have a test on a 32bit arch at least. i386, anyone?
>
> Looks fairly ok on ppc, only failures are:
.. same ones for 2.7.5, so I'm OK with this.
It looks like the tests are run twice t
On 2013/11/15 11:27, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> It'd be nice to have a test on a 32bit arch at least. i386, anyone?
Looks fairly ok on ppc, only failures are:
test_3_join_in_forked_from_thread (test.test_threading.ThreadJoinOnShutdown)
testPair (test.test_kqueue.TestKQueue)
More logs below if in
Package and test correctly here (amd64). Diff looks sane as well.
It'd be nice to have a test on a 32bit arch at least. i386, anyone?
I will see if I can get kqueue updated over the weekend.
f.-
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> I will test today and report back.
>
I will test today and report back.
As mentioned in private it'd be nice to include a fix for kqueue in the
update to avoid extra bumps.
I will look into it.
f.-
On 11 Nov 2013 15:52, "Remi Pointel" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update python from 2.7.5 to 2.7.6.
>
> I only tested on amd
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/04/11 16:18, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> > > The diff below updates python 2.7 to 2.7.4.
> >
> > I just installed the lates i386 snapshot to play with this. The build
> > fails see below. Any suggestions? I am looking forward to 3.
On 2013/04/11 16:18, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> > The diff below updates python 2.7 to 2.7.4.
>
> I just installed the lates i386 snapshot to play with this. The build
> fails see below. Any sugestions? I am looking forward to 3.3.1 upgrade.
> Feel free to send a priv
Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> The diff below updates python 2.7 to 2.7.4.
I just installed the lates i386 snapshot to play with this. The build
fails see below. Any sugestions? I am looking forward to 3.3.1 upgrade.
Feel free to send a private e-mail.
Best,
Predrag
===> Extracting for Python-2
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to use rthreads with Python.
>
> Attached are two diffs:
> - update 2.7.1 to use rthreads
> - update 2.7.1 to 2.7.2 to use rthreads
>
> Please test the first diff, and if everything is ok test the second.
Hi,
There's a failur
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:21:57PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
> Thanks for making this port. This will need testing on as many platforms
> as possible, at least i386, amd64, macppc and sparc64.
The port works well on amd64-current. test_httpservers fails when doing
make regress, but otherwise eve
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 17:21:57 +0600, Damien Miller wrote:
> I'd also like to make 2.6 the default MODPY_VERSION for this release.
that's great
--
Alexandr Shadchin
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Hi, Ports!
>
> Update Python 2.5.5 and 2.6.5. Also made small fixes
>
> Tested on i386.
Thanks for making this port. This will need testing on as many platforms
as possible, at least i386, amd64, macppc and sparc64.
I'd also like to make 2.6 the
steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tested on i386 and got 1 error during regression checks:
>
> test test_compare produced unexpected output:
> **
> *** lines 102-149 of actual output doesn't appear in expected output
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:48:28PM +0100, Aleksander Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here goes lang/python update. Please test and comment. Thanks.
I tested on i386 and got 1 error during regression checks:
test test_compare produced unexpected output:
**
On 11/11/05, Aleksander Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here goes lang/python update. Please test and comment. Thanks.
Regression tests pass for me on i386, macppc and amd64. I have also
tried a couple of py- modules that seem to work correctly.
Eric.
39 matches
Mail list logo
