On 2020/07/26 08:29, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sat Jul 25, 2020 at 01:55:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020/07/25 09:16, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > +WANTLIB += ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} boost_python${MODPY_VERSION:C/\.//g}-mt m
> >
> > Oh yeuch. Seems like a candidate for a boost.port.mk
On Sat Jul 25, 2020 at 01:55:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/07/25 09:16, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > +WANTLIB += ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} boost_python${MODPY_VERSION:C/\.//g}-mt m
>
> Oh yeuch. Seems like a candidate for a boost.port.mk with a
> ${MODBOOST_PYLIB} or something?
>
The exac
On 2020/07/25 09:16, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> +WANTLIB += ${COMPILER_LIBCXX} boost_python${MODPY_VERSION:C/\.//g}-mt m
Oh yeuch. Seems like a candidate for a boost.port.mk with a
${MODBOOST_PYLIB} or something?
On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> current boost.
>
> Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html
>
> I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted.
afaik the remaining failures
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> current boost.
>
> Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html
>
> I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted.
beside
On Sun, Jan 28 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
[...]
> Thank you both! FreeBSD applied the same patch.
ok jca@
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/kea/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.12 Mak
Il 28 gen 2018 16:32, "Landry Breuil" ha scritto:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:29:35AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi All!
> >
> > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> > current boost.
> >
> > Chan
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:29:35AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi All!
> >
> > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> > current boost.
> >
> > Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:38:34PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> current boost.
>
> Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html
>
> I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted.
Seen t
On Sat Jan 27, 2018 at 04:07:59PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> Il 27 gen 2018 3:56 PM, "Jeremie Courreges-Anglas" ha
> scritto:
>
> On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi All!
>
> Hey,
>
> > This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> > current boost.
> >
> >
I only tested a few deps on sparc64 so far. devel/dlib and
games/bastet* succeed, but net/kea** seems to suffer:
It's also upstream:
https://github.com/isc-projects/kea/commit/17ed090beb6cefa78e29a95c645eb6da4edf8028
Il 27 gen 2018 3:56 PM, "Jeremie Courreges-Anglas" ha
scritto:
On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
Hey,
> This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> current boost.
>
> Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html
>
> I did not bui
On Fri, Jan 26 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
Hey,
> This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the
> current boost.
>
> Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html
>
> I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted.
I only tested a few deps
On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
Hi All!
After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to s
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:59:19AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > >> Hi All!
> > >>
> > >> After a long
On Thu, Dec 21 2017, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>>> Hi All!
>>>
>>> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find
>>> attached a diff as tarball to
On Thu, December 21, 2017 02:59, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>>> Hi All!
>>>
>>> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please
>>> find
>>> attached a diff
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:59:19AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> >> Hi All!
> >>
> >> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please
> >> find
> >>
On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>> Hi All!
>>
>> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find
>> attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable version
>> 1.65.1.
>>
>>
Please find attached a second traball without botan to apply cleanly without
trapping in an error.
On Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find
> attached a diff as tarball to update boos
On Fri Dec 15, 2017 at 09:04:36AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi All!
> >
> > After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find
> > attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable vers
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please find
> attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable version
> 1.65.1.
>
> Notable port changes.
>
> - Of course bump all shar
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:46:03PM +0100, Auclair Vincent wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Auclair Vincent
>> wrote: > > Compiled ok :)
>> >
>> > regress didn't work
>> >
>> > # make regress
>> > ===> ?Regression check for
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:46:03PM +0100, Auclair Vincent wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Auclair Vincent
> wrote: > > Compiled ok :)
> >
> > regress didn't work
> >
> > # make regress
> > ===> ?Regression check for boost-1.41.0p0
> > make: cannot open Makefile.
> > *** Error code 2
> >
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Auclair Vincent
wrote:
> Compiled ok :)
>
> regress didn't work
>
> # make regress
> ===> Regression check for boost-1.41.0p0
> make: cannot open Makefile.
> *** Error code 2
>
> Stop in /yellowstone/workbox/git/ports/devel/boost (line 2226 of
> /usr/ports/infrast
Compiled ok :)
regress didn't work
# make regress
===> Regression check for boost-1.41.0p0
make: cannot open Makefile.
*** Error code 2
Stop in /yellowstone/workbox/git/ports/devel/boost (line 2226 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
tested on i386 using mainly boost::asio
Thanks fo
Compiled ok.
Tested on i386-current.
Thank you.
Hi,
> Just an update: To unbreak graphics/hugin when using boost-1.41
> someone would have to backport this fix from gcc 3.4:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17327
Nice finding.
> I have done a patch for gcc, but I think it is not complete as
> gcc-3.3.5 is missing the parser.c f
Markus Hennecke wrote:
Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:24:28AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009/12/13 08:23, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
if you're still interested
mind to update it to the latest version and send it again?
i have made step in past.
Stuart Henderson wro
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:24:28AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/12/13 08:23, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> > >if you're still interested
> > >mind to update it to the latest version and send it again?
> > >i have made step in past.
> >
> > Stuart Henderson wrote about boost 1.39:
> > "unfor
On 2009/12/13 08:23, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> >if you're still interested
> >mind to update it to the latest version and send it again?
> >i have made step in past.
>
> Stuart Henderson wrote about boost 1.39:
> "unfortunately this update breaks graphics/hugin, editors/openoffice3 and
> net/powerd
>if you're still interested
>mind to update it to the latest version and send it again?
>i have made step in past.
Stuart Henderson wrote about boost 1.39:
"unfortunately this update breaks graphics/hugin, editors/openoffice3 and
net/powerdns; build logs attached"
donno 'bout hugin.
i made patch
threads work too.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:11:21AM +0400, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> updated from 1.34.1 to 1.39.0.
>
> if there is some bugs, please let me now.
>
> thanks all for participation.
On 2009/05/15 10:11, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> updated from 1.34.1 to 1.39.0.
>
> if there is some bugs, please let me now.
>
> thanks all for participation.
thanks for working on this! your diff misses a few parts;
you need to 'cvs add' any newly added files, 'cvs rm' any files
that you remove
> The rest sounds good, however, the update breaks monotone. It
> seems that the boost_regex lib is unusable for us in 1.34.1:
>
> in devel/monotone:
>
> checking boost version 1.32.0 or newer... yes
> checking for the boost_filesystem library... yes
> checking for the boost_regex library... no
>
Mikko Tolmunen writes:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:52:15 Deanna Phillips wrote:
>> Neat. Could you please explain the reason for and origin of
>> the patches to boost code?
>
> BJAM_CONFIG environment variable can be used in CONFIGURE_ENV,
> as i added SO_VERSION variable to the boost jamfil
On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:52:15 Deanna Phillips wrote:
> Neat. Could you please explain the reason for and origin of the
> patches to boost code?
BJAM_CONFIG environment variable can be used in CONFIGURE_ENV, as i added
SO_VERSION variable to the boost jamfile that defines the version numbe
Neat. Could you please explain the reason for and origin of the
patches to boost code?
38 matches
Mail list logo
